Life and Matter: A Criticism of Professor Haeckel's "Riddle of the Universe"Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Religion
Life and Matter: A Criticism of Professor Haeckel's "Riddle of the Universe"
Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Haeckel, Ernst, 1834-1919. Welträthsel; Life -- Origin; Monism; Philosophy and religion
"Pantheism teaches that God and the world are one. The idea of
God is identical with that of nature or substance.... In
pantheism, God, as an _intra-mundane_ being, is everywhere
identical with nature itself, and is operative _within_ the
world as 'force' or 'energy.' The latter view alone is
compatible with our supreme law—the law of substance. It
follows necessarily that pantheism is _the world-system of the
modern scientist_" (p. 102).
"This 'godless world-system' substantially agrees with the
monism or pantheism of the modern scientist; it is only another
expression for it, emphasising its negative aspect, the
non-existence of any supernatural deity. In this sense
Schopenhauer justly remarks:
"'Pantheism is only a polite form of atheism. The truth of
pantheism lies in its destruction of the dualist antithesis of
God and the world, in its recognition that the world exists in
virtue of its own inherent forces. The maxim of the pantheist,
'God and the world are one,' is merely a polite way of giving
the Lord God his _congé_'" (p. 103).
Thus we are led on, from what may be supposed to be a bare statement of
two recent generalisations of science,—first of all to regard them as
almost axiomatic or self-evident; next, to consider that they solve the
main problem of the universe; and, lastly, that they suffice to replace
the Deity Himself.
To curb these extravagant pretensions it is only necessary to consider
soberly what these physical laws really assert.
_Conservation of Energy._
Take first the conservation of energy. This generalisation asserts that
in every complete material system, subject to any kind of internal
activity, the total energy of the system does not change, but is subject
merely to transference and transformation, and can only be increased or
diminished by passing fresh energy in or out through the walls of the
system. So far from this being self-evident, it required very careful
measurement and experimental proof to demonstrate the fact, for in
common experience the energy of a system left to itself continually to
all appearance diminishes; yet it has been skilfully proved that when
the heat and every other kind of product is collected and measured, the
result can be so expressed as to show a total constancy, appertaining to
a certain specially devised function called "energy," provided we know
and are able to account for every form into which the said energy can be
transformed by the activity going on. A very important generalisation
truly, and one which has so seized hold of the mind of the physicist
that if in any actual example a disappearance or a generation of energy
were found, he would at once conclude either that he had overlooked some
known form and thereby committed an error, or that some unknown form was
present which he had not allowed for: thereby getting a clue which, if
followed up, he would hope might result in a discovery.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account