| | | | | was about 57 months | | | | | old, and evidently had | | | | | stopped growing (for | | | | | movement see No. 2, | | | | | p. 110). | | | | | No. 4. |Female | | | |This individual, marked |July 13, 1949| 27 | 34-1/2 | .... | when less than two |June 1, 1950| 54-1/2 | 93-1/2 | 3.1 | weeks old, had grown |August 21, 1951| 74 |119 | .... | to nearly the maximum |May 1, 1952| 76 |123 | 10.0 | female size at an age of | | | | | 34 months; all four | | | | | captures within a | | | | | 175-foot diameter. | | | | | (See Figure 24). No. 5. |Female | | | | |April 15, 1950| 43 | 70 | 1.4 |All six records within a |June 5, 1950| 52-1/2 | 87 | 2.8 | 65-foot diameter (See |May 25, 1951| 71 | 82 + 29 | .... | Figure 21). |September 28, 1951| 73 |111 (regenerated) | .... | |April 26, 1952| 74 |113 (regenerated) | 7.4 | |April 24, 1953| 76 |114 (regenerated) | .... | | | | | | No. 6. |Female | | | |Hatched in July 1949, |April 21, 1950| 46 | 75 | 2.1 | this skink had attained |May 7, 1950| 48 | 15 (broken stub) | 2.0 | the maximum female |May 3, 1951| 74 | 29 + 57 | 8.5 | size at an age of a little |May 2, 1952| 78 | 25 + 64 | .... | more than three years; |August 27, 1952| 79-1/2 | 95 (regenerated) | 8.3 | (for movement see | | | | | Figure 25). | | | | | No. 7. |Female | | | |Hatched in July 1949, |June 5, 1950| 51 | 82 | 2.5 | this skink was 11 |July 13, 1950| 59 | 93 | 3.9 | months old and about
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account