|July 29, 1950| 64 | 98 | 4.4 | half-grown when it was |August 21, 1951| 69 | 80 (broken stub) | 5.0 | marked. When last |May 28, 1952| 73 | 83 + 9-1/2 | .... | caught at an age of 35 | | | | | months it was of average | | | | | adult female size, | | | | | having grown less than | | | | | numbers 4 and 6 at the | | | | | same age. All five captures | | | | | were within a 60-foot | | | | | diameter (Fig. 24). | | | | | No. 8. |Female | | | |Hatched in July 1949, |April 26, 1950| 50-1/2 | 78-1/2 | 2.7 | this skink was of average |May 24, 1951| 74 |107 (regenerated) | .... | adult female size |April 28, 1952| 78 | 93 (regenerated) | 8.5 | and was breeding in |April 23, 1953| 80 | 93 (regenerated) | .... | May 1951; it grew | | | | | nearly to maximum female | | | | | size in the next 11 | | | | | months. All captures | | | | | within a 70-foot diameter. No. 9. |Female | | | | |July 5, 1950| 60 | 95 | 4.5 |All three captures at the |August 6, 1951| 71 |106-1/2 | 5.6 | same site. |May 28, 1952| 72 |110 | 8.5 | | | | | | No. 10.|Male | | | |Hatched in July 1949, |April 23, 1950| 46-1/2 | 66 (regenerated) | 1.8 | this male grew less |June 13, 1950| 52-1/2 | 26 + 3 | 2.7 | rapidly than most, and |September 2, 1950| 66 | 32 + 51 | 6.2 | in the spring of 1953 |May 29, 1951| 67 | 33 + 58 | .... | was smaller than some |August 3, 1951| 70 | 94 (regenerated) | .... | others that were a year |March 27, 1953| 74 | 78 (regenerated) | 7.1 | younger, or even two | | | | | years younger. No.