Canada -- Social life and customs; Ontario -- Description and travel
City and country life compared--No aristocracy in Canada--Long
winter evenings--Social evenings--The bashful swain--Popular
literature of the day--A comfortable winter day at home--Young
farmers who have inherited property--Difficulty of obtaining female
help--Farmers trying town life--Universality of the love of country
life--Bismarck--Theocritus--Cato--Hesiod--Homer--Changes in town
values--A speculation in lard.
Your city dweller turns away from a life in the country on account of
society. Granted that we in the country cannot make calls and pay
fashionable visits as easily as you can. But most good country families
have a few genuine friends and acquaintances whom they visit
periodically, and such visits are really appreciated by the persons
entertaining. There is not much duplicity about our friendships, for we
are not so much thrown together as city people; and when we do meet at
the different family boards, genial right good fellowship is the rule.
The cant and half-friendly reception of your city fashionables we know
not of.
There is no aristocracy in Canada, and all attempts to found any such
class in America have signally failed. It is contrary to the genius and
spirit of the democracy of America, for are we not quite as democratic
as our neighbors to the south of us? Of all the prominent families who
were on the boards at the time of the American Revolution, in the last
century, only five are in existence this day. What a comment on the
mutability of human affairs! Your titles and riches don’t stick in
America, and there is many a boy in rural Ontario who now follows the
plough who will yet rise to eminence as his years increase. To create
and maintain a titled class in Canada, in the face and eyes of the great
Republic adjoining us, would be an anomaly, and it never can be done.
There seems to be a growing disposition to exclusiveness among the city
families, and to discriminate to too great a nicety as to whom their
sons and daughters shall marry. Their alliances in the matrimonial way
are ever to be with those of the presumably rich, in contradistinction
to others possessing push and merit, but not quite as many dollars in
immediate view. So far as I can judge, I do not know of the son of a
business man to-day in any of the country towns hereabout who inherits
the wealth his father once possessed, and who pursues his father’s
calling. John Adams, when ambassador of the United States to Paris,
wrote home to his daughter who asked his views about her approaching
marriage: “Marry an honest man and keep him honest.” In Adams’s advice
there is no mention of the _dot_, as the continental Europeans use the
term, and it is earnestly to be hoped that this word will never find any
currency among us.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account