The diverse movements induced by external stimuli in different organs of plants are extremely varied and complicated. The forces in operation are manifold--the influence of changing temperature, the stimulus of contact, of electric current, of gravity, and of light visible and invisible. They act on organs which exhibit all degrees of physiological differentiation, from the radial to the dorsiventral. An identical stimulus may sometimes induce one effect, and at other times, the precisely opposite. Thus under unilateral stimulation of light of increasing intensity, a radial organ exhibits a positive, a dia-phototropic, and finally a negative response. Strong sunlight brings about para-heliotropic or 'midday sleep' movement, by which the apices of leaves or leaflets turn towards or away from the source of illumination. The teleological argument advanced, that in this position the plant is protected from excessive transpiration, does not hold good universally; for under the same reaction, the leaflets of _Cassia montana_ assume positions by which the plant risks fatal loss of water. In _Averrhoa carambola_ the movement is downwards, whichever side is illuminated with strong light; in _Mimosa_ leaflet the movement, under similar circumstances is precisely in the opposite direction. The photonastic movement, apparently independent of the directive action of light, has come to be regarded as a phenomenon unrelated to phototropic reaction, and due to a different kind of irritability, and a different mode of response. So very anomalous are these various effects that Pfeffer, after showing the inadequacy of different theories that have been advanced, came to the conclusion that "the precise character of the stimulatory action of light has yet to be determined. When we say that an organ curves towards a source of illumination because of its heliotropic irritability, we are simply expressing an ascertained fact in a conveniently abbreviated form, without explaining why such curvature is possible or how it is produced."[2] [2] Pfeffer--_Ibid_--Vol. II, p. 74.