"Sir,--I have both of your letters and sketches, which shall be put
in hand. I understand it perfectly well. Since I wrote to you last
I have made several satisfactory trials of the engine, and think it
unnecessary to make any further experiments. The statement below may
be depended on for a future data. The load of the engine was 6280
lbs., being 20 lbs. to the inch for a 20-inch cylinder with a 6-feet
stroke, 12 strokes per minute, with three-quarters of a bushel of
coals per hour, giving a duty of 361,728,000 for 1 bushel of coal, a
duty far beyond anything done in the county by so small an engine. The
cold water sides round the condenser was 60 feet, and the water at 112
degrees temperature, not having a sufficient stream of cold water to
supply the cistern. Each foot of cold water sides did 7536 lbs. per
minute, about three times the work done in the county per foot of hot
boiler sides; therefore the condenser need not be more than one-third
of the boiler sides. By making the condenser of 4-inch copper tubes
and of an inch thick, it would stand in one-twentieth part of the
space of the boiler.
"I put a boiler naked to try cold air sides; it was very rusty, and
did not condense as fast as I expected. The engine worked exceedingly
well, but slow. The duty performed for each foot of cold air sides
was 565 lbs. per minute, about one-thirteenth part of the condensing
of cold water sides. We never wanted to get the steam above 60 lbs. to
the inch. I have no doubt but that copper pipes of 1/32nd of an inch
thick, clean and small, would do considerably more, because the hot
water that came out of the boiler from the condensed steam was but 170
decrees, and the external sides the same heat when the steam was 15
lbs. above the atmosphere in the condensing boiler. This boiler was 4
feet 6 inches diameter, and I think that towards the external sides of
the boiler there was a colder atmosphere, if I may call it so, than
what it was in the middle of this large condensing boiler, because I
found by trying a small tin tube, that it would condense 1500 lbs. for
each foot of cold air sides.
"However, as it is, it will do exceedingly well for portable purposes.
"The duty, I doubt not, will be, both for water and air sides
condensing, at least 50 per cent. above our Cornish engines, which
will be above four times what is now done with ships' engines,
especially when you take into consideration their getting steam from
salt water, and letting out so much water from the boiler to prevent
the salt from accumulating in the boiler, which will make 30 per cent.
more in its favour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account