"These engineers particularly requested that they might have a given
weight lifted, so as to be able to calculate the real duty done by a
bushel of coal.
"As they intend to make trial of the duty performed by the coal
consumed, they will state it as against the duty performed by
Boulton's great engines, which did upward of twenty-five millions,
when their 20-inch cylinders, after being put in the best order
possible, did not exceed ten millions. As you were consulted on all
those trials of Boulton's engines, your presence would have great
weight with those gents, otherwise I shall not have fair play. Let
me meet them on fair grounds and I will soon convince them of the
superiority of the '_Pressure-of-steam engine_.'"
[Footnote 64: See Trevithick's letter, 4th March, 1804, vol. i., p. 166.]
Watt left no stone unturned to prevent the use of high-pressure
steam-engines, and fortune favoured him, for after four or five days
Trevithick again wrote:--
"I am sorry to inform you that the experiments that were to be
exhibited before the London gents are put off, on account of
an accident which happened to Mr. Homfray. I find myself much
disappointed on account of the accident, for I was desirous to make
the engine go through its different work, that its effect might be
published as early as possible."[65]
[Footnote 65: See Trevithick's letter, 9th March, 1804, vol. i., p. 168.]
While constructing those numerous high-pressure engines for rolling
mills, winding engines, and pumping engines, the Welsh and Newcastle
locomotives were being made and worked, yet he found time to teach the
people of Stourbridge.
"MR. GIDDY, "STOURBRIDGE, _July 5th, 1804_.
"Sir,--I should have answered your letter some time since, but waited
to set two other engines to work first. The great engine at Penydarran
goes on exceedingly well. The engine will roll 150 tons of iron a week
with 18 tons of coal. The two engines of Boulton's at Dowlais burn
40 tons to roll 160 tons; they are a 24-inch and a 27-inch double.
The engine at Penydarran is 18-1/2 inches, 6-feet stroke, works
about eighteen strokes per minute: it requires the steam about 45
lbs. to the inch above the atmosphere. I worked it expansive first,
when working the hammer, which was a more regular load than rolling;
then with steam high enough to work twelve strokes per minute with
the cock open all the stroke; then I shut it off at half the stroke,
which reduced the number of strokes to ten and a half per minute,
the steam and load the same in both; but I did not continue to work
it expansively, because the work in rolling is very uneven, and the
careless workmen would stop the engine when working expansive.
"When the cylinder was full of steam the rollers could not stop it;
and as coal is not an object here, Mr. Homfray wished the engine
might be worked to its full power. The saving of coal would be very
great by working expansively.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account