Life's Handicap: Being Stories of Mine Own PeopleKipling, Rudyard
History
Life's Handicap: Being Stories of Mine Own People
Kipling, Rudyard
India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947 -- Fiction; India -- Social life and customs -- Fiction; Short stories, English
‘We were at work. Three men in red coats came. They saw the
Sahib--Dearsley Sahib. They made oration; and noticeably the small man
among the red-coats. Dearsley Sahib also made oration, and used many
very strong words. Upon this talk they departed together to an open
space, and there the fat man in the red coat fought with Dearsley Sahib
after the custom of white men--with his hands, making no noise, and
never at all pulling Dearsley Sahib’s hair. Such of us as were not
afraid beheld these things for just so long a time as a man needs to
cook the mid-day meal. The small man in the red coat had possessed
himself of Dearsley Sahib’s watch. No, he did not steal that watch. He
held it in his hand, and at certain seasons made outcry, and the twain
ceased their combat, which was like the combat of young bulls in spring.
Both men were soon all red, but Dearsley Sahib was much more red than
the other. Seeing this, and fearing for his life--because we greatly
loved him--some fifty of us made shift to rush upon the red-coats. But
a certain man--very black as to the hair, and in no way to be confused
with the small man, or the fat man who fought--that man, we affirm, ran
upon us, and of us he embraced some ten or fifty in both arms, and beat
our heads together, so that our livers turned to water, and we ran away.
It is not good to interfere in the fightings of white men. After that
Dearsley Sahib fell and did not rise, these men jumped upon his stomach
and despoiled him of all his money, and attempted to fire the pay-shed,
and departed. Is it true that Dearsley Sahib makes no complaint of these
latter things having been done? We were senseless with fear, and do not
at all remember. There was no palanquin near the pay-shed. What do we
know about palanquins? Is it true that Dearsley Sahib does not return to
this place, on account of his sickness, for ten days? This is the fault
of those bad men in the red coats, who should be severely punished; for
Dearsley Sahib is both our father and mother, and we love him much. Yet,
if Dearsley Sahib does not return to this place at all, we will speak
the truth. There was a palanquin, for the up-keep of which we were
forced to pay nine-tenths of our monthly wage. On such mulctings
Dearsley Sahib allowed us to make obeisance to him before the palanquin.
What could we do? We were poor men. He took a full half of our wages.
Will the Government repay us those moneys? Those three men in red coats
bore the palanquin upon their shoulders and departed. All the money that
Dearsley Sahib had taken from us was in the cushions of that palanquin.
Therefore they stole it. Thousands of rupees were there--all our money.
It was our bank-box, to fill which we cheerfully contributed to Dearsley
Sahib three-sevenths of our monthly wage. Why does the white man look
upon us with the eye of disfavour? Before God, there was a palanquin,
and now there is no palanquin; and if they send the police here to make
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account