Light and Colour Theories, and their relation to light and colour standardization — John Shaqi
Light and Colour Theories, and their relation to light and colour standardizationLovibond, Joseph W. (Joseph Williams)
Science
Light and Colour Theories, and their relation to light and colour standardization
Lovibond, Joseph W. (Joseph Williams)
Color; Light
The theory of the Scientists is based on the phenomena developed by
mixing coloured lights taken from different parts of the spectrum.
This is a method of synthesis, each added colour being a progressive
stage towards the complexity of white light. In this case the colour
developed is that of the preponderating ray of a complex beam. The
theory of the Artists is based on the phenomena developed by mixed
pigments. This is a method of analysis, tending towards ray simplicity,
each added pigment reducing the complexity of the colour developed by
its power of selective absorption.
The theoretical differences between the two schools appear to have
arisen from supposing that a given colour developed by the two
methods should correspond; but considering the differences in their
ray composition, this would be impossible, for although both may be
describable by one general colour term, as for instance a Red, they
would be of two varieties. It remains to be shown that one theory may
cover both sets of phenomena.
The Red, Green, and Violet theory appears to be based on two principal
assumptions: first that there are only three fundamental colours;
and second that the rays taken from different colour areas are pure
colours. Both assumptions are open to question. In regard to the first,
there is no difficulty in isolating six colours; and as to the second,
it can be demonstrated that the colours do overlap in every part, with
a double overlapping in the middle colours, and are therefore not
simple but complex.
PAST THEORIES.
In a work of this nature it is unnecessary to deal minutely with the
theories which have been adopted from time to time since Newton’s
discovery of the continuous spectrum. It will, however, be useful to
touch on the principal points where theorists are agreed, and also on
some of their points of difference, the latter in order to find, if
possible, the causes of their difference.
TABLE I.
----------------+-----+-------------------------------------------------
| No. |
| of | Primary Colours.
|Rays.|
----------------+-----+-------------------------------------------------
Newton (later) | 7 | Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, Violet
| |
Werner | 6 | Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Violet
| |
Newton and | |
Helmholtz | 5 | Red, Yellow, Green, Blue, Violet
(early) | |
| |
Hering | 4 | Red, Yellow, Green, Blue
| |
Chevieul, | |
Brewster, Hay, | |
Redgrave, Field | 3 | Red, Yellow, Blue
| |
Young, Helmholtz| |
(later) | 3 | Red, Green, Violet
----------------+-----+-------------------------------------------------
Note to Plate I.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account