The inventor did not manifest any antagonism to this criticism, but immediately pointed out the great economy in the consumption of oil that was arising from the use of his idea. Indeed, he prosecuted his claims so successfully that he clinched a profitable bargain to himself with the Government. His apparatus had been fitted to thirty-four lights, and he contracted to maintain them on the basis of receiving one-half of the oil previously consumed by the lamps which his invention superseded. This arrangement was in vogue for five years, when it was renewed, with the difference that on this occasion the Government, concluding that the inventor was making too much out of the transaction, reduced the allowance to one-third. Subsequently the invention received higher commendation from the officials than that advanced by the critical inspector, although it must be pointed out that meanwhile the magnifying bull’s-eye had been abandoned, and a new type of reflector introduced, so that the sole remaining feature of the wonderful invention was the lamp. Even that had been modified. When the Lighthouse Board was established in 1852 it abolished the much-discussed invention, and introduced the Fresnel system, bringing the United States into line with the rest of the world. [Illustration: FIG. 9.--TRIPLE FLASHING APPARATUS: THREE PANELS AND MIRROR. (_By permission of Messrs. Chance Bros. and Co., Ltd._)] One feature of the subject cannot fail to arrest attention. This is the possibility of producing a variety of combinations by the aid of the lenses to fulfil different requirements. The Fresnel, Stevenson, and Chance developments in the science of lighthouse optics facilitated this work very significantly. Accordingly, to-day a variety of lights, evolved from the variations in the mounting of the lenses, is in vogue. For purposes of identification they have been divided into a number of classifications, and, for the convenience of the navigator, are described as lights of the first order, second order, and so on. Broadly speaking, there are seven main groups, or orders, the rating only applying to dioptric or catadioptric lights, indicating the bending of the luminous rays in the desired direction, either by refraction and reflection through the medium of prisms, or a combination of both. Actually there is a distinction between these two, the true dioptric system referring only to refraction, where the ray is bent in the desired direction by a glass agent, known as a “refracting prism.” In the catadioptric system, on the other hand, both methods are employed, since the prism performs the dual purpose of reflecting and refracting the rays. However, in modern lighthouse parlance both are grouped under the one distinction “dioptric.”