To some the story may also suggest whether Shelley’s nature was one of
those most adapted for love in its highest form. It is impossible to
deny that he loved with a great intensity; yet it was with a certain
narrowness, and therefore a certain fitfulness. Possibly a somewhat
wider nature, taking hold of other characters at more points,—fascinated
as intensely, but more variously.—stirred as deeply, but through more
complicated emotions,—is requisite for the highest and most lasting
feeling. Passion, to be enduring, must be many-sided. Eager and narrow
emotions urge like the gadfly of the poet: but they pass away; they are
single; there is nothing to revive them. Various as human nature must
be the passion which absorbs that nature into itself. Shelley’s mode
of delineating women has a corresponding peculiarity. They are well
described; but they are described under only one aspect. Every one of his
poems almost has a lady whose arms are white, whose mind is sympathising,
and whose soul is beautiful. She has many names—Cythna, Asia, Emily; but
these are only external disguises; she is indubitably the same person,
for her character never varies. No character can be simpler. She is
described as the ideal object of love in its most simple and elemental
form; the pure object of the essential passion. She is a being to be
loved in a single moment, with eager eyes and gasping breath; but you
feel that in that moment you have seen the whole. There is nothing to
come to afterwards. The fascination is intense, but uniform. There is not
the ever-varying grace, the ever-changing expression of the unchanging
charm, that alone can attract for all time the shifting moods of a
various and mutable nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account