which recognises human feeling though intent on something above it. Of
all modern poets, Wordsworth shares the most in this peculiarity; perhaps
he is the only recent one who has it at all. He knew the hills beneath
whose shade ‘the generations are prepared:’
‘Much did he see of men,
Their passions and their feelings: chiefly those
Essential and eternal in the heart,
That mid the simple form of rural life
Exist more simple in their elements,
And speak a plainer language.’
Shelley has nothing of this. The essential feelings he hoped to change;
the eternal facts he struggled to remove. Nothing in human life to him
was inevitable or fixed; he fancied he could alter it all. His sphere
is the ‘unconditioned;’ he floats away into an imaginary Elysium or
an expected Utopia; beautiful and excellent, of course, but having
nothing in common with the absolute laws of the present world. Even in
the description of mere nature the difference may be noted. Wordsworth
describes the earth as we know it, with all its peculiarities; where
there are moors and hills, where the lichen grows, where the slate-rock
juts out. Shelley describes the universe. He rushes away among the stars;
this earth is an assortment of imagery, he uses it to deck some unknown
planet. He scorns ‘the smallest light that twinkles in the heavens.’ His
theme is the vast, the infinite, the immeasurable. He is not of our home,
nor homely; he describes not our world, but that which is common to all
worlds—the Platonic idea of a world. Where it can, his genius soars from
the concrete and real into the unknown, the indefinite, and the void.
Shelley’s success in the abstract lyric would prepare us for expecting
that he would fail in attempts at eloquence. The mind which bursts
forward of itself into the inane, is not likely to be eminent in the
composed adjustments of measured persuasion. A voluntary self-control is
necessary to the orator: even when he declaims, he must only let himself
go; a keen will must be ready, a wakeful attention at hand, to see that
he does not say a word by which his audience will not be touched. The
eloquence of ‘Queen Mab’ is of that unpersuasive kind which is admired in
the earliest youth, when things and life are unknown, when all that is
intelligible is the sound of words.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account