In this point of view we have always had a sympathy with the Cambridge
mathematician who has been so much abused. He said, ‘After all, _Paradise
Lost_ proves nothing;’ and various persons of poetical tastes and
temperament have been very severe on the prosaic observation. Yet,
‘after all,’ he was right. Milton professed to prove something. He was
too profound a critic—rather, he had too profound an instinct of those
eternal principles of art which criticism tries to state—not to know
that on such a subject he must prove something. He professed to deal with
the great problem of human destiny; to show why man was created, in what
kind of universe he lives, whence he came, and whither he goes. He dealt
of necessity with the greatest of subjects. He had to sketch the greatest
of objects. He was concerned with infinity and eternity even more than
with time and sense; he undertook to delineate the ways, and consequently
the character of Providence, as well as the conduct and the tendencies
of man. The essence of success in such an attempt is to satisfy the
religious sense of man; to bring home to our hearts what we know to be
true; to teach us what we have not seen; to awaken us to what we have
forgotten; to remove the ‘covering’ from all people, and ‘the veil’ that
is spread over all nations; to give us, in a word, such a conception of
things divine and human as we can accept, believe, and trust. The true
doctrine of criticism demands what Milton invites—an examination of the
degree in which the great epic attains this aim. And if, in examining it,
we find it necessary to use unusual illustrations, and plainer words than
are customary, it must be our excuse that we do not think the subject can
be made clear without them.
The defect of _Paradise Lost_ is that, after all, it is founded on a
_political_ transaction. The scene is in heaven very early in the history
of the universe, before the creation of man or the fall of Satan. We have
a description of a court. The angels,
‘By imperial summons called,’
appear
‘Under their hierarchs in orders bright:
Ten thousand thousand ensigns high advanced,
Standards and gonfalons ’twixt van and rear
Stream in the air, and for distinction serve
Of hierarchies, and orders, and degrees.’
To this assemblage ‘th’ Omnipotent’ speaks:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account