‘Hear, all ye Angels, progeny of light,
Thrones, Dominations, Princedoms, Virtues, Pow’rs,
Hear my decree, which unrevoked shall stand:
This day I have begot whom I declare
My only Son; and on this holy hill
Him have anointed, whom ye now behold
At my right hand; your Head I him appoint;
And by myself have sworn, to him shall bow
All knees in Heav’n, and shall confess him Lord:
Under his great vicegerent reign abide
United as one individual soul
For ever happy. Him who disobeys,
Me disobeys, breaks union, and that day,
Cast out from God and blessed vision, falls
Int’ utter darkness, deep ingulph’d, his place
Ordain’d without redemption, without end.’
This act of patronage was not popular at court; and why should it have
been? The religious sense is against it. The worship which sinful men
owe to God is not transferable to lieutenants and vicegerents. The whole
scene of the court jars upon a true feeling. We seem to be reading about
some emperor of history, who admits his son to a share in the empire, who
confers on him a considerable jurisdiction, and requires officials, with
‘standards and gonfalons,’ to bow before him. The orthodoxy of Milton is
quite as questionable as his accuracy. The old Athanasian creed was not
made by persons who would allow such a picture as that of Milton to stand
before their imaginations. The generation of the Son was to them a fact
‘before all time;’ an eternal fact. There was no question in their minds
of patronage or promotion. The Son was the Son before all time, just as
the Father was the Father before all time. Milton had in such matters
a bold but not very sensitive imagination. He accepted the inevitable
materialism of biblical, and, to some extent, of all religious language
as distinct revelation. He certainly believed, in contradiction to the
old creed, that God had both ‘parts and passions.’ He imagined that earth
‘Is but the shadow of heaven and things therein,
Each to other like more than on earth is thought.’
From some passages it would seem that he actually thought of God as
having ‘the members and form’ of a man. Naturally, therefore, he would
have no toleration for the mysterious notions of time and eternity
which are involved in the traditional doctrine. We are not, however,
now concerned with Milton’s belief, but with his representation of his
creed—his picture, so to say, of it in _Paradise Lost_; still, as we
cannot but think, that picture is almost irreligious, and certainly
different from that which has been generally accepted in Christendom.
Such phrases as ‘before all time,’ ‘eternal generation,’ are doubtless
very vaguely interpreted by the mass of men; nevertheless, no sensitively
orthodox man _could_ have drawn the picture of a generation, not to say
an exaltation, _in_ time.
We shall see this more clearly by reading what follows in the poem:
‘All seemed well pleased; all seemed, but were not all.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account