No element is better fitted to counteract the characteristic evil of an
aristocratic society. The defect of such societies in all times has been
frivolity. All talk has tended to become gossip; it has ceased to deal
with important subjects, and has devoted itself entirely to unimportant
incidents. Whether the Duc de —— has more or less prevailed with the
Marquise de —— is a sort of common form into which any details may be
fitted, and any names inserted. The frivolities of gallantry—never very
important save to some woman who has long been dead—fill the records
of all aristocracies who lived under a despotism, who had no political
authority, no daily political cares. The aristocracy of England in the
last century was, at any rate, exempt from _this_ reproach. There is
in the records of it not only an intellectuality, which would prove
little,—for every clever describer, by the subtleties of his language
and the arrangement of his composition, gives a sort of intellectuality
even to matters which have no pretension to it themselves,—but likewise
a pervading medium of political discussion. The very language in which
they are written is the language of political business. Horace Walpole
was certainly by nature no politician and no orator; yet no discerning
critic can read a page of his voluminous remains without feeling that
the writer has through life lived with politicians and talked with
politicians. A keen observant mind, not naturally political, but capable
of comprehending and viewing any subject which was brought before it, has
chanced to have this particular subject—politics—presented to it for a
lifetime; and all its delineations, all its efforts, all its thoughts,
reflect it, and are coloured by it. In all the records of the eighteenth
century the tonic of business is seen to combat the relaxing effect of
habitual luxury.
This element, too, is favourable to a clever woman. The more you can
put before such a person the greater she will be; the less her world,
the less she is. If you place the most keen-sighted lady in the midst
of the pure futilities and unmitigated flirtations of an aristocracy,
she will sink to the level of those elements, and will scarcely seem to
wish for anything more, or to be competent for anything higher. But if
she is placed in an intellectual atmosphere, in which political or other
important subjects are currently passing, you will probably find that
she can talk better upon them than you can, without your being able to
explain whence she derived either her information or her talent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account