It is certain that they were very intimate at one time; for Pope wrote
to her some of the most pompous letters of compliment in the language.
And the more intimate they were to begin with, the more sure they were
to be enemies in the end. Human nature will not endure that sort of
proximity. An irritable, vain poet, who always fancies that people are
trying to hurt him, whom no argument could convince that every one is
not perpetually thinking about him, cannot long be friendly with a witty
woman of unscrupulous tongue, who spares no one, who could sacrifice
a good friend for a bad _bon-mot_, who thinks of the person whom she
is addressing, not of those about whom she is speaking. The natural
relation of the two is that of victim and torturer, and no other will
long continue. There appear also to have been some money matters (of
all things in the world) between the two. Lady Mary was intrusted by
Pope with some money to use in speculation during the highly fashionable
panic which derives its name from the South-Sea Bubble,—and as of course
it was lost, Pope was very angry. Another story goes, that Pope made
serious love to Lady Mary, and that she laughed at him; upon which a
very personal, and not always very correct, controversy has arisen as to
the probability or improbability of Pope’s exciting a lady’s feelings.
Lord Byron took part in it with his usual acuteness and incisiveness,
and did not leave the discussion more decent than he found it. Pope
doubtless was deformed, and had not the large red health that uncivilised
women admire; yet a clever lady might have taken a fancy to him, for the
little creature knew what he was saying. There is, however, no evidence
that Lady Mary did so. We only know that there was a sudden coolness or
quarrel between them, and that it was the beginning of a long and bitter
hatred.
In their own times Pope’s sensitive disposition probably gave Lady
Mary a great advantage. Her tongue perhaps gave him more pain than his
pen gave her. But in later times she has fared the worse. What between
Pope’s sarcasms and Horace Walpole’s anecdotes, Lady Mary’s reputation
has suffered very considerably. As we have said, her offences are _non
proven_; there is no evidence to convict her; but she is likely to be
condemned upon the general doctrine that a person who is accused of much
is probably guilty of something.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account