In letter-writing of this kind Lady Mary was very skilful. She has the
highest merit of letter-writing—she is concise without being affected.
Fluency, which a great orator pronounced to be the curse of orators, is
at least equally the curse of writers. There are many people, many ladies
especially, who can write letters at any length, in any number, and at
any time. We may be quite sure that the letters so written are not good
letters. Composition of any sort implies consideration; you must see
where you are going before you can go straight, or can pick your steps
as you go. On the other hand, too much consideration is unfavourable
to the ease of letter-writing, and perhaps of all writing. A letter
too much studied wants flow; it is a museum of hoarded sentences. Each
sentence sounds effective; but the whole composition wants vitality. It
was written with the memory instead of the mind; and every reader feels
the effect, though only the critical reader can detect the cause. Lady
Mary understood all this. She said what she had to say in words that were
always graphic and always sufficiently good, but she avoided curious
felicity. Her expressions seem choice, but not chosen.
At the end of her life Lady Mary pointed a subordinate but not a useless
moral. The masters of mundane ethics observe that ‘you should stay in
the world, or stay out of the world.’ Lady Mary did neither. She went
out and tried to return. Horace Walpole thus describes the result: ‘Lady
Mary Wortley is arrived; I have seen her; I think her avarice, her
art, and her vivacity are all increased. Her dress, like her language,
is a _galimatias_ of several countries; the groundwork rags, and the
embroidery nastiness. She needs no cap, no handkerchief, no gown, no
petticoat, and no shoes. An old black laced hood represents the first;
the fur of a horseman’s coat, which replaces the third, serves for the
second; a dimity petticoat is deputy and officiates for the fourth;
and slippers act the part of the last. When I was at Florence, and she
was expected there, we were drawing _sortes Virgilianas_ for her; we
literally drew
“Insanam vatem aspicies.”
It would have been a stranger prophecy now even than it was then.’ There
is a description of what the favourite of society becomes after leaving
it for years, and after indulging eccentricities for years! There is a
commentary on the blunder of exposing yourself in your old age to young
people, to whom you have always been a tradition and a name! Horace
Walpole doubtless painted up a few trivialities a little. But one of the
traits is true. Lady Mary lived before the age in which people waste half
their lives in washing the whole of their persons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account