The poetry of society tends to the poetry of love. All poetry tends that
way. By some very subtle links, which no metaphysician has skilfully
tracked, the imagination, even in effects and employments which seem
remote, is singularly so connected. One smiles to see the feeling
recur. Half the poets can scarcely keep away from it: in the high and
dry epic you may see the poet return to it. And perhaps this is not
unaccountable. The more delicate and stealing the sensuous element, the
more the mind is disposed to brood upon it; the more we dwell on it in
stillness, the more it influences the wandering, hovering faculty which
we term imagination. The first constructive effort of imagination is
beyond the limit of consciousness; the faculty works unseen. But we
know that it works in a certain soft leisure only: and this in ordinary
minds is almost confined to, in the highest is most commonly accompanied
by, the subtlest emotion of reverie. So insinuating is that feeling,
that no poet is alive to all its influences; so potent is it, that the
words of a great poet, in our complex modern time, are rarely ever free
from its traces. The phrase ‘stealing calm,’ which most naturally and
graphically describes the state of soul in which the imagination works,
quite equally expresses, it is said, the coming in and continuance of the
not uncommon emotion. Passing, however, from such metaphysics, there is
no difficulty in believing that the poetry of society will tend to the
most romantic part of society,—away from aunts and uncles, antiquaries
and wigs, to younger and pleasanter elements. The talk of society does
so, probably its literature will do so likewise. There are, nevertheless,
some limiting considerations, which make this tendency less all-powerful
than we might expect it to be. In the first place, the poetry of society
cannot deal with passion. Its light touch is not competent to express
eager, intense emotion. Rather, we should say, the essential nature
of the poetry of amusement is inconsistent with those rugged, firm,
aboriginal elements which passion brings to the surface. The volcano is
inconsistent with careless talk; you cannot comfortably associate with
lava. Such songs as those of Burns are the very antithesis to the levity
of society. A certain explicitness pervades them:
‘Come, let me take thee to my breast,
And pledge we ne’er shall sunder;
And I shall spurn as vilest dust
The warld’s wealth and grandeur.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account