Sterne went to Cambridge, and though he did not acquire elaborate
learning, he thoroughly learned a gentlemanly stock of elementary
knowledge. There is even something scholarlike about his style. It bears
the indefinable traces which an exact study of words will always leave
upon the use of words. He was accused of stealing learning, and it is
likely enough that a great many needless quotations which were stuck
into _Tristram Shandy_ were abstracted from second-hand storehouses
where such things are to be found. But what he stole was worth very
little, and his theft may now at least be pardoned, for it injures the
popularity of his works. Our present novel-readers do not at all care for
an elaborate caricature of the scholastic learning; it is so obsolete
that we do not care to have it mimicked. Much of _Tristram Shandy_ is a
sort of antediluvian fun, in which uncouth Saurian jokes play idly in an
unintelligible world.
When he left college, Sterne had a piece of good fortune which in fact
ruined him. He had an uncle with much influence in the Church, and he
was thereby induced to enter the Church. There could not have been a
greater error. He had no special vice; he was notorious for no wild
dissipation or unpardonable folly; he had done nothing which even in this
more discreet age would be considered imprudent. He had even a refinement
which must have saved him from gross vice, and a nicety of nature which
must have saved him from coarse associations. But for all that he was
as little fit for a Christian priest as if he had been a drunkard and a
profligate. Perhaps he was less fit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account