There are certain persons whom taste guides, much as morality and
conscience guide ordinary persons. They are ‘gentlemen.’ They revolt from
what is coarse; are sickened by that which is gross; hate what is ugly.
They have no temptation to what we may call ordinary vices; they have
no inclination for such raw food; on the contrary, they are repelled by
it, and loathe it. The law in their members does _not_ war against the
law of their mind; on the contrary, the _taste_ of their bodily nature
is mainly in harmony with what conscience would prescribe or religion
direct. They may not have heard the saying that the ‘beautiful is higher
than the good, for it includes the good.’ But when they do hear it,
it comes upon them as a revelation of their instinctive creed, of the
guidance under which they have been living all their lives. They are pure
because it is ugly to be impure; innocent because it is out of taste to
be otherwise; they live within the hedge-rows of polished society; they
do not wish to go beyond them into the great deep of human life; they
have a horror of that ‘impious ocean,’ yet not of the impiety, but of the
miscellaneous noise, the disordered confusion of the whole. These are
the men whom it is hardest to make Christian,—for the simplest reason;
paganism is sufficient for them. Their pride of the eye is a good pride;
their love of the flesh is a delicate and directing love. They keep
‘within the pathways’ because they dislike the gross, the uncultured, and
the untrodden. Thus they reject the primitive precept which comes before
Christianity. Repent! repent! says a voice in the wilderness; but the
delicate pagan feels superior to the voice in the wilderness. Why should
he attend to this uncouth person? He has nice clothes and well-chosen
food, the treasures of exact knowledge, the delicate results of the
highest civilisation. Is he to be directed by a person of savage habits,
with a distorted countenance, who lives on wild honey, who does not
wear decent clothes? To the pure worshipper of beauty, to the naturally
refined pagan, conscience and the religion of conscience are not merely
intruders, but barbarous intruders. At least so it is in youth, when
life is simple and temptations if strong are distinct. Years afterwards,
probably, the purest pagan will be taught by a constant accession of
indistinct temptations, and by a gradual declension of his nature, that
taste at the best, and sentiment of the very purest, are insufficient
guides in the perplexing labyrinth of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account