American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
Hence back of all, the one thing that has told most in keeping White’s
book alive is undoubtedly its sound style--sentences actually filled
with the living breath of a man. We are everywhere face to face with
something genuine and real; objects, ideas, stand out on the page; the
articulation is easy and distinct. White had no literary ambitions.
His style is that of a scholar, but of a scholar devoted to natural
knowledge. There was evidently something winsome and charming about the
man personally, and these qualities reappear in his pages.
He was probably a parson who made as many calls afield as in the
village, if not more. An old nurse in his family said of him, fifty
years after his death, “He was a still, quiet body, and that there was
not a bit of harm in him.”
White was a type of the true observer, the man with the detective eye.
He did not seek to read his own thoughts and theories into Nature, but
submitted his mind to her with absolute frankness and ingenuousness.
He had infinite curiosity, and delighted in nothing so much as a new
fact about the birds and the wild life around him. To see the thing
as it was in itself and in its relations, that was his ambition. He
could resist the tendency of his own mind to believe without sufficient
evidence. Apparently he wanted to fall in with the notion current
during the last century, that swallows hibernated in the mud in the
bottoms of streams and ponds, but he could not gather convincing proof.
It was not enough that a few belated specimens were seen in the fall
lingering about such localities, or again hovering over them early in
spring; or that some old grandfather had seen a man who had taken live
swallows out of the mud. Produce the man and let us cross-question
him,--that was White’s attitude. Dr. Johnson said confidently that
swallows did thus pass the winter in the mud “conglobulated into a
ball,” but Johnson had that literary cast of mind that prefers a
picturesque statement to the exact fact. White was led astray by no
literary ambition. His interest in the life of nature was truly a
scientific one; he must know the fact first, and then give it to the
humanities. How true it is in science, in literature, in life, that
any secondary motive vitiates the result! Seek ye the kingdom of truth
first, and all things shall be added.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account