American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
White’s book diffuses a sort of rural England atmosphere through the
mind. It is not the work of a city man who went down into the country
to write it up, but of a born countryman,--one who had in the very
texture of his mind the flavor of rural things. Then it is the growth
of a particular locality. Let a man stick his staff into the ground
anywhere and say, “This is home,” and describe things from that point
of view, or as they stand related to that spot,--the weather, the
fauna, the flora,--and his account shall have an interest to us it
could not have if not thus located and defined. This is one secret
of White’s charm. His work has a home air, a certain privacy and
particularity. The great world is afar off; Selborne is as snug and
secluded as a chimney corner; we get an authentic glimpse into the real
life of one man there; we see him going about intent, lovingly intent,
upon every phase of nature about him. We get glimpses into humble
cottages and into the ways and doings of the people; we see the bacon
drying in the chimneys; we see the poor gathering in Wolmer Forest the
sticks and twigs dropped by the rooks in building their nests; we see
them claiming the “lop and top” when the big trees are cut. Indeed,
the human touches, the human figures here and there in White’s pages,
add much to the interest. The glimpses we get of his own goings and
comings--we wish there were more of them. We should like to know what
took him to London during that great snowstorm of January, 1776, and
how he got there, inasmuch as the roads were so blocked by the snow
that the carriages from Bath with their fine ladies on their way to
attend the Queen’s birthday, were unable to get through. “The ladies
fretted, and offered large rewards to labourers if they would shovel
them a track to London, but the relentless heaps of snow were too bulky
to be removed.” The parson found the city bedded deep in snow, and so
noiseless by reason of it that “it seemed to convey an uncomfortable
idea of desolation.”
When one reads the writers of our own day upon rural England and the
wild life there, he finds that they have not the charm of the Selborne
naturalist; mainly, I think, because they go out with deliberate
intent to write up nature. They choose their theme; the theme does not
choose them. They love the birds and flowers for the literary effects
they can produce out of them. It requires no great talent to go out
in the fields or woods and describe in graceful sentences what one
sees there,--birds, trees, flowers, clouds, streams; but to give the
atmosphere of these things, to seize the significant and interesting
features and to put the reader into sympathetic communication with
them, that is another matter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account