American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
The calm that comes after the storm in human life as in nature--how
true the analogy. To give vent to things, how significant. To give vent
to angry feelings in words, how like giving vent to smothered fire; or
to any suppressed and confined force: the words come faster and hotter,
the passion of anger mounts and there is a “blow out” indeed. Deny
yourself the first word, and the conflagration is avoided. A passion
can be smothered as literally as a fire.
The use of metaphor, comparison, analogy is twofold--to enliven and to
convince; to illustrate and enforce an accepted truth, and to press
home and clinch one in dispute. An apt figure will put a new face
upon an old and much worn truism, and a vital analogy may reach and
move the reason. Thus when Renan, referring to the decay of the old
religious beliefs, says that people are no poorer for being robbed
of false bank notes and bogus shares, his comparison has a logical
validity,--as has also Herbert Spencer’s figure when he says, “The
illusion that great men and great events came oftener in early times
than now is partly due to historical perspective. As in a range
of equidistant columns the farthest off look the closest, so the
conspicuous objects of the past seem more thickly clustered the more
remote they are.” We seem to see the identity of law in both these
cases. We are treated to a pictorial argument.
We are using analogy in a legitimate and forceful way when we speak of
our fund or capital of bodily health and strength, and of squandering
or impairing it, or of investing it poorly.
The accidental analogies or likenesses are limitless and are the great
stock in trade of most writers and speakers. They tickle the fancy and
enliven the page or the discourse. But essential analogies, or those
that spring from unity of law, are more rare. These have the force of
logic; they shed a steady light.
St. Paul’s famous comparison of the body dead and buried with the seed
in the soil, which, he says, dies before it can grow, is used with
logical intent. But will it bear examination? Is the germinating seed
dead in any sense that the body is dead? It is no more dead than the
egg buried beneath the mother hen is dead. When the egg really dies
we know the result, as we know the result when the corn rots in the
ground. It is not dissolution that the seed experiences, but evolution.
The illustration of the eloquent apostle may captivate the fancy, but
as argument designed to convince the understanding it has no force.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account