American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
If a writer does not bring a new thought, he must at least bring a new
quality,--he must give a fresh, new flavor to the old thoughts. Style
or quality will keep a man’s work alive whose thought is essentially
commonplace, as is the case with Addison; and Arnold justly observes of
the poet Gray that his gift of style doubles his force and “raises him
to a rank beyond what his natural richness and power seem to warrant.”
There is the correct, conventional, respectable and scholarly use of
language of the mass of writers, and there is the fresh, stimulating,
quickening use of it of the man of genius. How apt and racy and telling
is often the language of unlettered persons; the born writer carries
this same gift into a higher sphere. There is a passage in one of
Emerson’s early letters, written when he was but twenty-four, and given
by Mr. Cabot in his Memoir, which shows how clearly at that age Emerson
discerned the secret of good writing and good preaching.
“I preach half of every Sunday. When I attended church on the other
half of a Sunday, and the image in the pulpit was all of clay, and
not of tunable metal, I said to myself that if men would avoid that
general language and general manner in which they strive to hide
all that is peculiar, and would say only what is uppermost in their
own minds, after their own individual manner, every man would be
interesting.... But whatever properties a man of narrow intellect feels
to be peculiar he studiously hides; he is ashamed or afraid of himself,
and all his communications to men are unskillful plagiarisms from the
common stock of thought and knowledge, and he is of course flat and
tiresome.”
The great mass of the writing and sermonizing of any age is of the kind
here indicated; it is the result of the machinery of culture and of
books and the schools put into successful operation. But now and then
a man appears whose writing is vital; his page may be homely, but it
is alive; it is full of personal magnetism. The writer does not merely
give us what he thinks or knows; he gives us himself. There is nothing
secondary or artificial between himself and his reader. It is books
of this kind that mankind does not willingly let die. Some minds are
like an open fire,--how direct and instant our communication with them;
how they interest us; there are no screens or disguises; we see and
feel the vital play of their thought; we are face to face with their
spirits. Indeed all good literature, whether poetry or prose, is the
open fire; there is directness, reality, charm; we get something at
first-hand that warms and stimulates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account