American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
It is quality of mind which makes the writings of Burke rank above
those of Gladstone, Ruskin’s criticism above that of Hamerton, Froude’s
histories above Freeman’s, Renan’s “Life of Jesus” above that of
Strauss; which makes the pages of Goethe, Coleridge, Lamb, literature
in a sense that the works of many able minds are not. These men impart
something personal and distinctive to the language they use. They make
the words their own. The literary quality is not something put on. It
is not of the hand, it is of the mind; it is not of the mind, but of
the soul; it is of whatever is most vital and characteristic in the
writer. It is confined to no particular manner and to no particular
matter. It may be the gift of writers of widely different manners--of
Carlyle as well as of Arnold; and in men of similar manners, one may
have it and the other may not. It is as subtle as the tone of the voice
or the glance of the eye. Quality is the one thing in life that cannot
be analyzed, and it is the one thing in art that cannot be imitated. A
man’s manner may be copied, but his style, his charm, his real value,
can only be parodied. In the conscious or unconscious imitations of the
major poets by the minor, we get only a suggestion of the manner of the
former; their essential quality cannot be reproduced.
English literature is full of imitations of the Greek poets, but
that which the Greek poets did not and could not borrow they cannot
lend; their quality stays with them. The charm of spoken discourse is
largely in the personal quality of the speaker--something intangible
to print. When we see the thing in print, we wonder how it could so
have charmed or moved us. To convey this charm, this aroma of the man,
to the written discourse is the triumph of style. A recent French
critic says of Madame de Staël that she had no style; she wrote just
as she thought, but without being able to impart to her writing the
living quality of her speech. It is not importance of subject matter
that makes a work great, but importance of the subjectivity of the
writer,--a great mind, a great soul, a great personality. A work that
bears the imprint of these, that is charged with the life and power of
these, which it gives forth again under pressure, is alone entitled to
high rank.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account