American essays; Literature -- History and criticism
Here are the old eternal elements,--life, nature, the soul, man and
woman, all in danger of becoming dull, commonplace, uninteresting to
us. But the man with the creative touch gives us a new and lively sense
of them, by presenting them to us in new combinations and under new
lights. The only new thing added is himself,--the quality or flavor of
his own genius.
A complete criticism will not limit itself to description or to
interpretation; it will seek to estimate, to bring out the relative or
absolute value of the thing. Mr. Howells in his trenchant little volume
on “Criticism and Fiction,” says the critic has no more business to
trample on a poem, a novel, or an essay that does not please him, than
the botanist has to grind a plant under his heel because he does not
find it pretty. His business “is to classify and analyze the fruits of
the human mind as the naturalist classifies the objects of his study,
rather than to praise or blame them.”
To classify and analyze the fruits of the human mind is certainly one
of the functions of criticism, and only one. The analogy Mr. Howells
employs is misleading. We do not sit in judgment on natural specimens
and products except as they stand related to human wants and utilities.
We compare climates, seasons, soils, landscapes, with reference to
racial and individual needs and well-being. If you bring me trees from
the woods or stone from the quarry to build my house with, I am bound
to sit in judgment upon them. And when my house is built, my neighbors
will sit in judgment upon it. Of all artificial things, of all man’s
works, we are bound to ask, are they well done? are they what they
should be? are they the best of their kind? Shall we not ask these
questions of the poem also, of the novel, the essay, the history?
Art has relations to life, and the critic is bound to consider what
these relations are in any given work,--how true, how important; he is
examining a human product, not a natural specimen, and is as competent
to reject as to accept; he must compare, weigh, appraise, to the best
of his ability.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account