This, however, is the fanaticism
of pedantry. The French _conteurs_ of the last century, following in
the track of Hop o' my Thumb, made and narrated many pleasing
discoveries, if they also wrote much that was feeble and is faded. To
admit this is but common fairness; literary fairy tales may legitimately
amuse both old and young, though 'it needs heaven-sent moments for this
skill.' The _conteurs_, like every one who does not always stretch the
bow of Apollo till it breaks, had, of course, their severe censors. To
listen to some persons, one might think that gaiety was a crime. You
scribble light verses, and you are solemnly told that this is not high
poetry, told it by worthy creatures whose rhymes could be uncommonly
elevated, if mere owl-like solemnity could make poetry and secure
elevation. You make a fairy tale, and you are told that the incidents
border on the impossible, that analysis of character, and the discussion
of grave social and theological problems are conspicuously absent. The
old _conteurs_ were met by those ponderous objections. Madame d'Aulnoy,
in _Ponce de Léon_, makes one of her characters defend the literary
_Märchen_ in its place. 'I am persuaded that, in spite of serious
critics, there is an art in the simplicity of the stories, and I have
known persons of taste who sometimes found in them an hour's
amusement.... He would be ridiculous who wanted to hear and read nothing
but such legends, and he who should write them in a pompous and inflated
style, would rob them of their proper character, but I am persuaded
that, after some serious occupation, _l'on peut badiner avec_.' 'I
hold,' said Melanie, 'that such stories should be neither trivial nor
bombastic, that they should hold a middle course, rather gay than
serious, not without a shade of moral, above all, they should be offered
as trifles, which the listener alone has a right to put his price upon.'
This is very just criticism of literary fairy tales, made in an age
when we read of a professional _faiseur des contes des fées vieux et
modernes_.
_Little Johannes_ is very modern, and, as Juana says in _Ponce de Léon_:
'Vous y mettrez le prix qu'il vous plaira, mais je ne peux m'empêcher de
dire que celui qui le compose est capable de choses plus importantes,
quand il veut s'en donner la peine.'
ANDREW LANG.
[Footnote 1: Part of what follows I have already stated in a reprint of
_Perrault's Popular Tales_, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1888.]
[Footnote 2: In forty-one volumes, Paris, 1785-89.]
[Footnote 3: There are complete English translations of the eighteenth
century. Many of the stories have been retold by Miss M. Wright, in the
_Red_ and _Blue Fairy Books_.]
[Footnote 4: I am unacquainted with the date of composition of this
story about a Ring more potent than that of Gyges. (It is printed in the
second volume of _Dialogues des Morts_ Paris, 1718).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account