Lives of Fair and Gallant Ladies. Vol 2.Brantôme, Pierre de Bourdeille
History
Lives of Fair and Gallant Ladies. Vol 2.
Brantôme, Pierre de Bourdeille
Erotic literature
The Mondragola of Machiavelli, which reflects Italian morals at the
time of the Renaissance, is well known. Lafontaine has later made use
of this motif in one of his humorous stories. In the fourth chapter
Liguro arrays in battle order an officer, a valet and a doctor, for a
humorous love expedition. Liguro says: “In the right corner we shall
place Callimaque; I shall place myself in the extreme left corner, and
the doctor in the middle. He will be called St. Cuckold.”
An interlocutor: “Who is this Saint?”
“The greatest Saint of France.”
This question and the answer given are delicious. Brantôme might have
made this witticism even in his time. Perhaps he merely did not write
it down, for after all he could not make too extensive use of his
favorite play with the word “cocu.”
“The cuckold, the greatest Saint of France”; this might have been the
motto of the “Dames Galantes.” Philarete Chasles would have denied
this, of course. He always maintained that Gaul was pure and chaste,
and that if France was full of vice, it had merely been infected by
neighboring peoples. But this worthy academician was well informed
merely regarding Italian influence. He was extremely unaware of the
existence of the cuckold in the sixteenth century. He even asserts in
the strongest terms (in his preface to the edition of 1834) that all
of this had not been so serious; the courtiers had merely desired to
be immoral in an elegant fashion. He even calls Brantôme “un fanfaron
de licence,” a braggart of vice. Indeed he would feel unhappy if he
could not reassure us: “Quand il se plonge dans les impuretes, c’est,
croyez-moi, pure fanfaronnade de vice.” Who would not smile at this
worthy academician who has remained so unfamiliar with the history of
his kings? His “believe me” sounds very well. But the best is yet to
come. The book of the “Dames Galantes” was by no means to be considered
merely a frivolous collection of scandalous anecdotes, but a “curious
historical document.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account