Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 2 (of 2)Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft
Science
Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft
Authors, French -- Biography
He entered the college of Louis-le-Grand, of which the Jesuits were the
preceptors. Here the boy learned, not to take part with the Jesuits, but
to despise the Jansenists, against whom, as an author, he showed himself
hostile. The talents of the child rendered him a favourite with the
greater number of his masters; father Porée, professor of rhetoric, saw
the germ of remarkable talents, which he took great pleasure in
developing; and, in after life, Voltaire always expressed gratitude for
his master's encouragement and kindness. Encouragement of a far
different and of a pernicious sort he received from another professor,
father le Jay, who entered into arguments with his pupil; was irritated
by his wit and sophistry; and on one occasion, angrily exclaimed that he
would become the "Choryphæus of Deism,"--a prophecy which this very
denunciation helped probably to fulfil. On all sides, the boy found
admiration for his premature genius. His godfather introduced him to
Ninon de L'Enclos, then advanced in years, but still full of that warmth
of intellect and feeling that distinguished her whole career. She
perceived and appreciated the child's genius, and no doubt her kindness
and conversation tended to open his mind and refine his wit at a very
early age. When she died, Ninon left him a legacy to buy books.
On leaving college the abbé de Chateauneuf introduced his godson into
Parisian society. There had been a time when Louis XIV. assembled the
most distinguished men of the kingdom at his court, and wit and
refinement were almost confined to the circles of Versailles. In his old
age, under the tutelage of madame de Maintenon and his confessors, Louis
disregarded every merit but that of piety which bore the Molinist stamp.
Catinat was disgraced, notwithstanding his virtues and military talents,
because he was suspected of freethinking; the duke de Vendôme was
reproached bitterly for not going daily to mass: bigotry, hypocrisy, and
dulness reigned at Versailles. But the king was old, and could no longer
make his will the fashion of the day. Unfortunately, bigotry and
hypocrisy are apt to beget their opposites. The society of Paris,
throwing off the yoke of royal intolerance, gave itself up to pleasure
and licence. The young Arouet was introduced to the circles whose
members enjoyed pre-eminence for birth and talent; he became a
favourite; he wrote verses; he meditated a tragedy: his whole heart was
devoted to becoming a poet and man of letters. When, on occasion of the
dispute between Jean Baptiste Rousseau and Saurin, the former was
banished, the young Arouet took the part of the victim, and exerted
himself to make a subscription in his favour. He was now known and
admired by all the first people of Paris, though he failed when he
wished to bring out a tragedy on the stage, and to be crowned by the
academy. The actors rejected his play; the academicians preferred
another poet. The disappointed youth revenged himself by writing a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account