return to France—merely subaltern whose life isn’t very highly valued. But in my heart I shall know myself a man. There’s no one understands my motive but you three, who have most to lose by my cripplement or death. All my friends over here think me an ass to throw away such chances—they say I’m economically squandering myself in the place where I’m least trained to do the best work. I know they talk sense; but they don’t talk chivalry. If every man took the first chance offered him to get out of the catastrophe, where would the Huns’ offensive end? You’ve probably been writing hard at The Father of a Soldier, and saying all that you would like to say to me in that. I’m most anxious to see the manuscript of it. If you please, how could the son of the man who wrote that book accept a cushy job? I wonder if you’ve reached the point yet where you don’t think that dying matters? I suspect you have. You remember what Roosevelt said after seeing his last son off, “If he comes back he’ll have to explain to me the why and how.” That’s the Japanese spirit—honour demands when a man returns from battle that he can give good reasons why he is not dead. Others, his friends and comrades, are dead; how does he happen to be living? In that connection I think of Charlie S., lying somewhere in the mud of Ypres, with an insignificant cross above his head. He won a dozen decorations which were not given him. He had a baby whom he had only seen once. He was my pal. Why should I live, while he is dead? I can always hear him singing in the mess in a pleasant tenor voice. We used to share our affections and our troubles. He was what the Canadians call “a white man.” I can’t see myself living in comfort while he is dead. It’s odd the things one remembers about a man. We got the idea in the Somme that oil on the feet would prevent them from becoming frozen. One time when Charlie was going up forward we hadn’t any oil, so he used brilliantine. It smelt of violets, and we made the highest of game of him. Poor old Charlie, he doesn’t feel the cold now! I’m afraid I’ve written a lot of rot in this letter—I’ve talked far too much of a host of things which are better left unsaid. But I had to—I wanted to make quite certain that you wouldn’t blame me for refusing safety. I’ve relieved myself immensely by getting all of this off my chest. XXII London December 17, 1917 I’m waiting for Eric, and, while waiting, propose to tell you the story of my past few days. I think when you’ve come to the end of my account you’ll agree that I’ve been mixing my drinks considerably with regard to the personalities whose acquaintance I have made. On Friday evening I was invited to dinner by Lieutenant C., the American Navy man with whom I crossed in November. I met—whom do you think?—George Grossmith, Leslie Henson, Julia James, Madge Saunders, and Lord C————.