Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants — John Shaqi
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
Having accepted the logic of the serpent, and having transferred
her faith from the word of God to the tree of knowledge at Satan’s
suggestion, the woman could easily be led to test the truth of all his
statements by her senses. A theory had been advanced; the experimental
process now began. That is the way men now gain their knowledge, but
their wisdom comes otherwise. She looked upon the forbidden fruit,
but no physical change was perceptible as the result of the misuse of
this sense. This led her to feel more sure that the argument used had
been correct. Her ears were attentive to the words of the serpent, but
she perceived no change as a result of the perverted use of the sense
of hearing. This, to the changing mind of the woman, was still more
conclusive proof that the words of Christ and angels did not mean what
she had at first thought they meant. The senses of touch, smell, and
taste were in turn used, and each corroborated the conclusion drawn by
the devil. The woman was deceived, and through the deception her mind was
changed. This same change of mind may be wrought either by deception or
as a result of false reasoning.
[Sidenote: A change in the mind of Adam]
Eve approached Adam with the fruit in her hand. Instead of answering in
the oft-repeated words of Christ, “In the day that thou eatest thereof
thou shalt surely die,” he took up the logic of the serpent. Having
eaten, his mind was also changed. He who from creation had thought the
thoughts of God, was yielding to the mind of the enemy. The exactness
with which he had once understood the mind of God was exemplified when
he named the animals; for the thought of God which formed the animal
passed through the mind of Adam, and “whatsoever Adam called every living
creature, that _was_ the name thereof.”
[Sidenote: Evidence of a changed mind]
The completeness of the change which took place is seen in the argument
used when God walked in the garden in the cool of the evening. Said Adam,
“The woman gave me to eat. Thou gavest me the woman. Therefore Thou
art to blame.” This was another decidedly logical conclusion, from the
standpoint of the wisdom of the serpent, and it was repeated by Eve,
who laid the blame first on the serpent, and finally on God himself.
Self-justification, self-exaltation, self-worship,—here was the human
origin of the papacy, that power which “opposeth and exalteth itself
above all that is called God.”
[Sidenote: Spiritual death the first result of sin]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account