Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
This spirit of freedom, which has been almost wrenched, one might say,
from many of the institutions of higher learning, is occasionally
found to have swayed the hearts of earlier educators. One reads with
keen relish the history of the founding of the University of Virginia,
the moving spirit of which was Thomas Jefferson. The reader will be
interested in a paragraph by Boone:—
“As early as 1779, while the ‘Old Dominion,’ with her sister States, was
embroiled in a doubtful war; and again in 1814, after numerous defeats
and constant opposition from the already-established William and Mary
College, from the Protestant churches, and from most of the political
leaders of the time, Mr. Jefferson and his friends sought to provide for
the state, along with the general system of education, a university, in
which should be taught in the highest degree, ‘every branch of knowledge,
whether calculated to enrich, stimulate, and adorn the understanding,
or to be useful in the arts and practical business of life.’ Five years
later (1819) an act of the Assembly was obtained establishing the
University of Virginia. When six years later it was opened, after a wide
acquaintance and careful study of the most progressive institutions in
the United States, it was found that in discipline and instruction, in
constitution and means, it very materially differed from them all.”[168]
[Sidenote: Freedom from other objectionable features]
The far-reaching sight of the chief promoter of the enterprise is seen
when we note wherein lay this very material difference. “There is one
practice,” wrote Mr. Jefferson, “from which we shall certainly vary,
although it has been copied by nearly every college and academy in
the United States; that is, the holding of the students all to one
prescribed course of reading, and disallowing exclusive application
to those branches only which are to qualify them for the particular
vocation to which they are destined. We shall, on the contrary, allow
them uncontrolled choice in the lectures they shall choose to attend, and
_require elementary_ qualifications only, and sufficient age.”[169]
This was a wonderful step for the time in which it occurred, and
indicates the direction given to minds of men by the Spirit of God. The
greater freedom occasioned by the adoption of the elective system is felt
throughout the educational centers of our land. Johns Hopkins University
grants the degree of B.A. in four out of six of its courses without the
classics. This leads us, however, to a consideration of the question
suggested several pages back, _What subjects can of right be taught in
schools supported from the public funds?_
[Sidenote: Should the state support the school]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account