Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for ProtestantsSutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Religion
Living Fountains or Broken Cisterns: An Educational Problem for Protestants
Sutherland, E. A. (Edward Alexander)
Church and education; Education -- History; Religious education
Education, pure and simple, in the breadth of its meaning, is character
development. The state, as such, can not judge of motives, hence it
can not educate the inner man. The two phases of the Reformation were
Protestantism and republicanism; the first deals with the spiritual
nature, and through this reaches the entire man, making a symmetrical
character; the governmental part deals only with the mental and
physical—the outward manifestations. To the church was committed the
charge of the spiritual man, and the commission to “teach all nations”
given to the little company that watched the ascending Lord, was repeated
to the church in the sixteenth century; and with especial weight was this
burden laid upon the shoulders of American men and women. The state needs
men to carry forward its pursuits; and for the purely secular training of
such individuals, it has a perfect right, even a duty, to provide from
the common fund. A purely mechanical, secular, or business course might
therefore be offered in our state schools; but with such an education few
parents are contented. The moral nature needs training; in order to be
good citizens, it is argued, some part of the system of ethics which is
based on the doctrines of Christ must be inculcated. Christian schools,
and those only, can give a spiritual education. This is the dilemma
in which the educational system found itself about the time of the
Revolution, and the matter, instead of reaching a satisfactory solution,
has grown steadily worse. The churches failed to provide for the
Christian training; and the state felt that something must be done for
the children. Public schools were established; but these, by right, can
not teach morality or anything pertaining thereto. But they do. Hence,
the church by her failure has forced the state into the attempt to do
her work,—an impossible task. Again, the churches and the denominational
schools, not willing to be outdone by state institutions, have extended
their stakes and lengthened their cords until they offer, not those
subjects which are character building, so much as those which will enable
them to compete with state institutions. Here again is a departure from
Christian education, and a mixture which would be hard to designate as
other than papal.
[Sidenote: Degrees a papal mark]
Again, the state sets its seal upon work done in institutions which it
supports, and the Christian schools—those in name at least—not only
accept public money, but allow the state to put its seal to their work
in the granting of literary degrees and diplomas. This is a natural
result of the union of worldly education and the principles of Christian
education which we have followed through two centuries, and yet to-day
there is scarcely a school claiming to be Christian in its principles
that dare raise its voice against the customs of its sister institutions.
[Sidenote: Education and state unite; result, papal]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account