Joyfully he entered the fray as soon as the Lords threw out the Budget.
In a public speech made immediately after the Lords' action he said: "I
come here to-day not to preach a funeral oration. I am here neither to
bury nor to praise the Budget. If it is buried it is in the sure and
certain hope of a glorious resurrection. As to its merits, no one
appreciates them more sincerely than I do, but its slaughter has raised
greater, graver, and more fruitful issues. We have got to arrest the
criminal. We have to see he perpetrates no further crime. A new
chapter is now being written for the sinister assembly which is more
responsible than any other power for wrecking popular hopes, but which,
in my judgment, has perpetrated its last act of destructive fury. They
have slain the Budget. In doing so they have killed the bill which, if
you will permit me to say so, had in it more promises of better things
for the people of this country than most things which have been
submitted to the House of Commons. It made provision against the
inevitable evils which befall such large masses of our poor population,
through old age, infirmity, sickness, and unemployment. The schemes of
which the Budget was the small foundation would, in my judgment, if
they had been allowed to fructify, have eliminated at least hunger from
the terrors that haunt the workman's cottage. Yet here you have an
order of men blessed with every fortune which Providence can bestow on
them grudging a small pittance out of their super-abundance in order to
protect those who have built up their wealth against the haunting
terror of misery and despair. They have thrown it out, and in doing so
they have initiated one of the greatest, gravest, and most promising
struggles of the time. Liberty owes as much to the foolhardiness of
its foes as it does to the sapience and wisdom of its friends. At last
the case between the peers and the people has been set down for trial
in the great assize of the people, and the verdict will be given soon."
The country was quickly in the midst of the election. It cannot be
said that Lloyd George dealt lightly with the House of Lords. Here is
a typical reference: "Who are the guardians of this mighty British
people? I shall have to make exceptions, but they are men who have
neither the training, the qualifications, nor the experience which
would fit them for such a gigantic task. The majority of them are
simply men whose sole qualification is that they are the first-born of
persons who had just as little qualifications as themselves. To invite
this imperial race, this, the greatest commercial nation in the world,
the nation that has taught the world in the principles of
self-government and liberty--to invite this nation itself to sign a
decree that declares itself unfit to govern itself without the
guardianship of such people, that is an insult which I hope will be
thrown back with ignominy."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account