Lodges in the WildernessScully, W. C. (William Charles)
History
Lodges in the Wilderness
Scully, W. C. (William Charles)
Natural history -- South Africa; South Africa -- Description and travel
The host kept the conversational ball rolling without an effort.
Andries was pathetically puzzled; the situation had got beyond him. He
was as prejudiced on the Colour Question as are most colonists; in the
abstract he hated the idea of sitting at table with coloured people.
But on this occasion he felt himself to be completely outclassed in the
items of manners and culture; consequently he became acutely
embarrassed. However, he appreciated the coffee (he told me afterwards
that his own wife, who had a wide reputation as a coffee-maker, could
not have made it better) and the bread and honey were delicious.
Of whom was it that Mr Hein reminded me? His personality set some
familiar chord vibrating. Was it--yes, it was--Parson Primrose; it was
he and none other. I tried to extend the parallel. Either of the sons
might, at a pitch, have passed for Moses. George? Well,--hardly.
Olivia and Sophia?--Oh, well--hm--that was another matter. But at all
events there was the dear old Vicar, reincarnated under a yellow skin,
in that citadel of loneliness that had a hundred-mile fosse of desert
sand and a rampart of all-but-impassible mountains,--that most remote
corner of the habitable world. Chamisso was right:--
"Alle menschen sind einander gleich."
Next morning I met the "Raad," and we discussed the matter of the
flogging. That Raad was a quaint assemblage; surely the most peculiar
parliament on earth. It was composed of elderly men, all of a more or
less monkeylike physiognomy. Mr Hein took the chair and filled it with
the utmost dignity. The members were restrained in manner, temperate in
discussion and logical in all they said. Their delivery was pleasing,
the rules of debate were strictly observed. Several of the speeches
were made in Dutch; those given in the Hottentot tongue were interpreted
into Dutch for my benefit.
The individual who had received the flogging was present. He was a
young married man with a weak chin, a shifty eye and a voluble tongue.
His face possessed a certain measure of meretricious good-looks,
evidently he was a lady-killer; one of the cheaper varieties of that
species. He, an officer of the church, had committed an offence against
the moral law. The partner in his guilt was present, looking
sufficiently woe-begone. She did not possess the fatal gift of
beauty,--at all events according to Caucasian standards. The injured
spouse, attired in a goatskin robe, was present and wept softly at
intervals throughout the proceedings. She was distinctly less uncomely
than the erring sister.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account