Londinium, Architecture and the CraftsLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
History
Londinium, Architecture and the Crafts
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
England -- Antiquities, Roman; London (England) -- Antiquities, Roman; Romans -- England -- London
“To put an end to incessant pillage the Gallo-Roman towns sacrificed
their faubourgs, and, retrenching their extent, surrounded themselves
with strong walls, which were very often supported on sculptured blocks
taken from destroyed edifices. Le Mans, like the towns of Senlis, Tours,
Autun, Bourges, Fréjus, etc., girded itself with ramparts flanked with
round-fronted towers, of which important remains still exist, especially
along the river Sarthe. The _enceinte_ of Le Mans enclosed an area about
500 by 200 metres” (A. Ledru, 1900).
[Illustration:
FIG. 38.
]
_Gates._—The excavations of 1903 at the Old Bailey revealed some
remnants of the Roman gate on the site of Newgate. The most significant
of these was a portion of plinth on the City side, with a return at the
south end. This, as shown in _Archæologia_, lix., by Dr. P. Norman, when
linked up with earlier discoveries made in 1875, allowed of the recovery
of the plan of the gate (Fig. 38). The plinth had been removed from its
place before I saw it, but the stones were certainly shaped in Roman
days; they had a chamfer 8 in. wide, with a square face of similar width
below, and they had been strongly cramped together; one had a “return
end,” and clearly came from a corner (A and B). A portion of the western
plinth was discovered in 1909 (_Archæol._ lxiii.). The gate, with its
towers on either side, had a frontage of about 96 ft.—probably 100 Roman
feet, as a Roman foot was about 11·60 in. The space between the towers
appears to have been about 35 ft., which is not more than sufficient for
two large archways. The great gate at Colchester, which was about 107
ft. wide, had two carriage-ways 17 ft. wide, and two small side openings
6 ft. wide as well (see _J.R.S._, 1919). Enough of the walling was found
in 1875 to show that the London gate was of stone bonded with tiles; it
was erected on a thick platform of “clay and ragstone,” which raised the
plinth about 5 ft. above the plinth of the adjoining City Wall. Fig. 39
is a restoration of the front.
[Illustration:
FIG. 39.
]
Several years ago a mass of masonry with a face to the south was found
under Bishopsgate Street a little within the line of the wall;
underlying it was “puddling of flint and clay” over a wide area. It was
suggested at the time (_Archæeol._ lx. p. 58) that this masonry and
foundation might have belonged to Roman Bishopsgate, and the finding of
what seems to have been a similar platform at Newgate strengthens the
hypothesis. It had long ago been pointed out by T. Wright that the gate
at Lymne was raised on a platform of big stones. At Lymne and Pevensey
entrance gates had round-fronted towers, and the great gate at
Colchester had quadrants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account