London (England) -- History; London (England) -- Social life and customs
You have heard the story how Augusta disappeared, and how the East
Saxons found it deserted, and how London was born, not the daughter of
Augusta at all. Augusta was childless.
_APPENDIX TO CHAPTER I_
The principal Roman buildings consisted of a bridge, a wall, a fort
at either end of this bridge, and two ports--Queenhithe and
Billingsgate. No one knows when the bridge was built: the wall was
not erected until some time between A.D. 350 and A.D. 369. At that
time the area enclosed by the wall was covered with villas and
gardens. The wall has been traced with certainty, and portions
either of the original wall or the mediæval repairs have been found
in many places, and may still be seen above-ground. The Roman
remains which have been dug up consist of mosaic pavements,
sepulchral cists, keys, toilet articles, lamps, fibulæ, amphoræ,
domestic things, and a few bronze statuettes. Nothing whatever has
been found to show that Augusta was ever a great city, in the sense
that Massilia, Ephesus, Bordeaux, or Alexandria was great.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] See _The Two Lost Centuries of Britain_, by W. H. Babcock.
Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1890; an excellent little work on this
subject.
II
SAXON AND NORMAN
The citizens of New London--Augusta having thus perished---were from the
outset a people of mixed race. But the Saxons, and especially the East
Saxons, prevailed. Strangely, it is Essex which has always prevailed in
London. The modern Cockney dialect, which says "laidy" and "baiby" for
lady and baby, and "whoy" and "hoigh" for why and high, is pure Essex:
you can hear it spoken all over the country districts of that
little-visited county: it is a dialect so strong that it destroys all
other fashions of speech, even the burr of Cumberland and the broad
drawl of Devonshire. Saxon London was mainly East Saxon. But, besides
the new owners of London, there was, first of all, some remnant of the
scattered Welsh. I do not mean the miserable survivors of Augustan
London, found in the place when it was first entered, but those Britons
who had taken refuge in the forests of Surrey, Sussex, and Middlesex,
and there lived as they could, until they could safely venture forth
among their conquerors. Gildas, as we have seen, speaks of these people;
and their skulls remain in the Saxon cemeteries to prove how great a
Celtic element survived among the English conquerors. Next, there were
the foreign merchants. This class formed a considerable proportion of
the better class; and it grew larger every day, because the East Saxon
was certainly not so sharp in affairs as the "man of Rouen;" nor was he
in business capacity equal to the Fleming and the German. But as
happens, _mutatis mutandis_, at the present day, those who were Flemings
and the men of Rouen, speaking their own language, under Ethelred, had
all become Londoners, speaking the English tongue, under Henry
Beauclerk.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account