London (England) -- History; London (England) -- Social life and customs
The city (Fitz Stephen adds), like Rome, is divided into wards, has
annual sheriffs for its consuls, has senatorial and lower
magistrates, sewers and aqueducts in its streets--its proper places
and separate courts for cases of each kind, deliberative,
demonstrative, judicial--and has assemblies on appointed days. I do
not think there is a city with more commendable customs of church
attendance, honor to God's ordinances, keeping sacred festivals,
almsgiving, hospitality, confirming betrothals, contracting
marriages, celebration of nuptials, preparing feasts, cheering the
guests, and also in care for funerals and the interment of the dead.
The only pests of London are the immoderate drinking of fools, and
the frequency of fires. To this may be added that nearly all the
Bishops, Abbots, and Magnates of England are, as it were, citizens
and freemen of London, having their own splendid houses to which
they resort, where they spend largely when summoned to great
Councils by the King or by their Metropolitan, or drawn thither by
their own private affairs.
A noble picture of a noble city!
[Illustration: RIVER TILTING IN THE TWELFTH CENTURY]
Let us consider the monuments of the City. There remains of Saxon London
nothing. Of Norman London, the great White Tower, the crypt of Bow, the
crypt of St. John's Priory (outside the City), part of the church of
Bartholomew the Great, part of St. Ethelburga's, Bishopsgate; there is
nothing more.[7]
The cathedral of St. Paul's when Fitz Stephen wrote was slowly rising
from its ashes. It had been already twice destroyed by fire. First, the
church founded by Mellitus and beautified by Bishop Cedd and King Sebbi
was burned to the ground in the year 961. We know nothing at all of this
building or of its successor, which was destroyed in the year 1086.
Bishop Maurice began to rebuild the church in the following year, but it
was two hundred years before it was completed. This cathedral therefore
belongs to a later period. That which was destroyed in 1084 must have
resembled in its round arches and thick pillars the cathedral of Durham.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account