London (Ancient and Modern) from the Sanitary and Medical Point of View — John Shaqi
London (Ancient and Modern) from the Sanitary and Medical Point of ViewPoore, George Vivian
History
London (Ancient and Modern) from the Sanitary and Medical Point of View
Poore, George Vivian
Medicine -- England -- London -- History -- 19th century; Sanitation -- England -- London -- History -- 19th century
Our friend’s library was tolerably complete, for here we have a list of
the medical “scriptures,” Greek, Roman, and Arabian, an acquaintance
with which was the whole duty of a physician, and which to doubt was
heresy. The last two names on the list refer to John of Gaddesden and
Gilbert, both English writers, of whom I shall have a few words to say
presently.
“Of his diete mesurable was he,
For it was of no superfluité,
But of gret norisching and digestible.”
Doubtless there were many things then which took the place of
pancreatic emulsion and extract of malt.
“His studie was but litel on the Bible.”
This line is frequently quoted to show that the scepticism with which
doctors are often charged is of no modern growth. The point of the
line is, however, to be found in the fact that Chaucer’s doctor was
certainly a priest, as were all the physicians of his time, and that
the practice of medicine had drawn him away, somewhat unduly perhaps,
from the clerical profession, to which he also belonged.
“In sangwyn and in pers he clad was al,
Lyned with taffata and with sendal.”
A robe of scarlet and sky-blue, lined with silk. Equally gorgeous
doctors may be seen at the present time by those who attend at
Burlington Gardens on “Presentation Day.”
“And yit he was but esy in dispence;
He kepte that he wan in pestilence.
For gold in phisik is a cordial;
Therefore he lovede gold in special.”
The priest-physician was fully as fond of his fees as are any of his
successors. But to come to particular instances which prove the truth
of Chaucer’s graphic picture.
EARLIEST LONDON PRACTITIONERS.
The “Gilbertyn” of Chaucer’s doctor was =Gilbertus Anglicus=, an
Englishman who wrote a work on medicine about the year 1290, and it is
remarkable from the fact that it gave the first description of leprosy
written by western writers, leprosy being a disease which has long
ceased to exist in this country. He treated apoplexy with ants’ eggs,
scorpions’ oil, and the flesh of lions; but where he obtained this
latter commodity it is hard to tell. For urinary calculi he advised the
administration of the blood of a he-goat fed upon parsley and saxifrage.
=John of Gaddesden= was a graduate of Merton College, Oxford, and wrote
his famous medical treatise, “Rosa Anglica,” about 1305. He is said
to have been greedy of money, and he recommends his contemporaries
to make arrangements about fees before undertaking a case. He was an
ecclesiastic, and was court physician to Edward II. and Edward III. He
tells us that bleeding is hurtful at the time of the feasts of St. John
and St. Stephen, but necessary at Christmas because of the custom of
overloading the stomach with cakes at that season. Pigs’ dung was his
favourite hæmostatic; and when the son of the King had small-pox, he
was careful that everything about his couch should be red.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account