London and Its Environs Described, vol. 4 (of 6): Containing an Account of Whatever is Most Remarkable for Grandeur, Elegance, Curiosity or Use, in the City and in the Country Twenty Miles Round ItAnonymous
History
London and Its Environs Described, vol. 4 (of 6): Containing an Account of Whatever is Most Remarkable for Grandeur, Elegance, Curiosity or Use, in the City and in the Country Twenty Miles Round It
Anonymous
London (England) -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; London (England) -- Gazetteers -- Early works to 1800
However, in 1746 the Lord Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Council,
considering the many lives that were lost thro’ the streightness of the
arches, and the enormous size of the sterlings, which took up one fourth
of the water way, and occasioned the fall at low water to be no less
than five feet; as well as the great expence of repairing the bridge,
which for several years had annually amounted to 2000l. came to the
resolution of taking down all the houses, and to widen and enlarge one
or more of the arches. Accordingly the Court ordered their surveyor to
draw a plan, and make an estimate of the expence; which having done, the
total amounted to 95,000l. when it was immediately agreed not to grant
or renew any lease or leases of the houses, but to let those unexpired
run out, and consequently the houses run to ruin. _Stow._ _Maitland._
Indeed this scheme was in part proposed immediately after the fire of
London, by both Sir Christopher Wren and Sir John Evelyn; these
ingenious gentlemen proposing, instead of houses, to have a substantial
balustrade on each side; and after them, the author of the _Review of
the public buildings_ had the following remarks, “As some people are
ignorant enough to admire the bridge merely because it is encumbered
with houses from end to end; it will not be amiss to observe, that
nothing can be more ridiculous than this invention; nothing can possibly
offend the eye more, or extinguish so many beauties as might take place,
in case this popular nuisance was removed: suppose the present structure
of the bridge was still to continue as it is, there would, at least, be
room for a magnificent breast-work and balustrade above, and the top
would afford one of the finest prospects in the world: on one hand a
fleet of merchant ships, equal in value and importance to half a nation;
on the other, two of the most considerable cities in Europe, stretching
along the banks of a beautiful river, and ending with a distant view of
the adjacent landscape.”
At length the leaning houses on each side seemed ready to fall into the
river, and the passenger could scarcely forbear shuddering, when he
observed that any of them was inhabited. At the same time, the structure
of the noble bridge at Westminster, with the magnitude, safety, and
convenience of the arches, convinced the citizens more and more of the
advantages that would arise from the resolution of pulling down the
houses; and in the year 1756, every one was pleased, that the Lord
Mayor, Aldermen and Common Council, had applied to parliament to enable
them to put this resolution in practice. In short, an act was obtained,
and they were enabled to provide for the expence, by collecting a toll
for every horse and carriage that passed over it, except those used for
tillage, till the principal and interest of the money that should be
borrowed and laid out upon it, should be repaid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account