Guilds -- England -- London; London (England) -- Description and travel; London (England) -- History
_Photo. Sandell, Ltd._
MERCERS’ HALL
]
The patronage of the church before 1253 was in the hands of Ralph
Tricket, who gave it in 1253 to the Prior and Canons of St.
Bartholomew, Smithfield; after the Reformation it continued in the
Crown up to 1666, when it was annexed to St. Olave.
Houseling people in 1548 were 120.
Chantries were, founded here: For Henry atte Roth, chandeler, to
which Richard Scot was admitted, February 7, 1391-92; for William
Love, to which Stephen Benet was collated, January 24, 1391-92. Only
two monuments are recorded by Strype, neither of which commemorate
persons of eminence. There was a free school, said to have been
founded by Thomas à Becket, in the Old Jewry, for twenty-five
scholars. There were also two almshouses for nine widows of
Armourers or Braziers, the gift of Mr. Tindal, citizen and armourer
of London.
John Kingscote, Bishop of Carlisle, 1462, was rector here.
In Ironmonger Lane is the Mercers’ Hall.
THE MERCERS COMPANY
The Mercers, although not incorporated until the year 1393 (17th
Richard II.), were in very early times associated voluntarily for
the purposes of mutual aid and comfort. They come to light as a
fraternity first in the time of Henry II., for Gilbert à Becket, the
father of St. Thomas of Canterbury, is said to have been a mercer;
and in the year 1192, Agnes de Helles, sister of St. Thomas, and her
husband, Thomas Fitztheobald de Helles, in founding the hospital of
St. Thomas of Acon, which is distinctly stated to have been built on
the spot where the future archbishop was born, constituted the
fraternity of mercers patrons of the hospital. The hospital and the
Company were intimately connected until the Reformation, and afford
a good example of the connection of secular guilds and
ecclesiastical foundations in the Middle Ages, secular guilds being
established for the promotion of trade and almsdeeds, and
ecclesiastical foundations for devotion and almsdeeds.
It is probable that a guild could not be carried on without the
King’s licence at this early date; and it would seem a necessary
interference that the mercers had a licence at the time of Henry
II., from their not appearing among the “adulterine” guilds, or
guilds set up without the King’s licence, which were fined in 1180
for being established without such licence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account