London Days: A Book of ReminiscencesWarren, Arthur
History
London Days: A Book of Reminiscences
Warren, Arthur
London (England) -- Intellectual life; London (England) -- Social life and customs
Capel alluded to himself as a "lamb" in politics, but his allusion to
politicians opposed to his way of thinking were anything but lamblike
that early evening. He had published a pamphlet called "Great Britain
and Rome, or Ought the Queen to Hold Diplomatic Relations with the
Sovereign Pontiff?" Of course he held that she ought, and he said so
to the immense disapproval of the majority of his fellow countrymen.
He had also produced a pamphlet on the Irish Question which, then as
now, could be counted on for enraging and puzzling half the population.
The solution proposed by him, was, I believe, more Roman Catholicism,
but why and how to get more of what was already in excess one did not
see then, and sees now even less than before.
But Capel's star was dimming. His Catholic college, or university, or
whatever it was, had failed for lack of support and faults of
administration, and the financial troubles were soon to drive him to
the {39} bankruptcy court, if they had not already done so. And His
Eminence Cardinal Manning had thrown his influence against the
captivating Monsignor. The Cardinal had his reasons, and, I suppose,
they were good reasons. At any rate, like Shylock's, they were
sufficient. When the Cardinal was against a man in his flock, that
man's chances for preferment, and even for holding his own, were not
worth discussing. Capel went to America in 1883. He sailed on the
_Arizona_ whose captain was the brother of my friend, Henry Murray.
The Monsignor made a meteoric flash over the American continent. I saw
him there. And then the continent swallowed him. He died in
California, if not unknown then practically forgotten.
The sequel to my visit at Scarsdale Lodge was an article, and the
article was sent, on chance, to the _Boston Herald_, then the leading
newspaper in New England and of almost metropolitan importance. I did
not know any one connected with the paper, not even the editor's name.
But the article was printed, although I did not know that until some
months later, at the end of 1882, when I turned up in Boston, at the
_Herald_ office, and asked for the editor, sending him my card with a
message of inquiry about the article which I had posted to him from
London some months earlier.
I intended to ask him for a job, for I had decided to settle awhile in
Boston and turn my London experiences to account if the opportunity
could be made.
A boy came to the room where I had waited on the anxious seat for an
unhappy quarter of an hour.
{40}
"Mr. Holmes will see you," he said. "Come this way."
Holmes was the man's name, was it! Yes, John H. I had learned that
much, and I followed the boy to an inner office. A dark-haired,
slender, agreeable-mannered man, who looked rather like the Whitelaw
Reid of that time, rose from his desk. As he did so I said:
"Mr. Holmes, I believe."
"Yes," said he, "and you are the writer of that article?" naming it.
"Yes," said I.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account