London Days: A Book of ReminiscencesWarren, Arthur
History
London Days: A Book of Reminiscences
Warren, Arthur
London (England) -- Intellectual life; London (England) -- Social life and customs
But if you attempt to analyse London it will baffle your effort. It is
at once so splendid and so mean, so spacious and so meagre, so
beautiful and so ugly, so noisy and so quiet, so restless and restful,
that the farther you go the more puzzled you become, unless having
begun by questioning it you end by accepting. Take it in its own way
and you will see that it is in itself a problem that cannot be solved
by a study of weeks or months; it is a study for a lifetime, for many
lifetimes. For instance: architecturally it is too often saddening and
mean.
Some one will fly into a rage when he reads the preceding sentence. He
will ask resentfully if I think Westminster Abbey, the Parliament
Buildings, St. Paul's Cathedral sad, or mean, or shabby. Of course I
do not. Their nobility and beauty almost redeem the hundreds of square
miles of common-place and melancholy builders' work that encumbers
London. Yet how the mean shops press upon St. Paul's and shut it in!
Could anything be uglier than the National Gallery? Could any
important thoroughfare be more conducive to depression of {11} spirits
than Victoria Street? It's not the old London that is architecturally
ugly and mean; it is the modern London, and usually the more modern the
greater the affliction to the eye. Somebody said, I think it was
Schelling, "Architecture is frozen music." Would not anybody say that
the Methodist mountain in Westminster is frozen pudding?
London in the late seventies was architecturally less saddening than
now, because less that was pretentious and defiant of good taste had
been undertaken. Its public buildings of later date are the worst in
Europe, excepting those that have arisen in Germany. Squat, heavy, out
of proportion, lacking in dignity, in beauty, they seem to have been
erected for the purpose of proving that in architecture the modern
Briton will neither imitate nor aspire. "The finest site in Europe" is
almost the meanest sight. The marvel is that a capital and a country
having so many fine models of earlier date do not repeat them, improve
upon them, or attempt even a finer taste. The opportunities have been
unrivalled, but about the achievements the less said the better. Acres
of slums have been swept away to be superseded by miles of masonry
which serve mainly to prevent an acquaintance with good taste. What
public "improvement" could be shabbier than Shaftsbury Avenue, meaner
than newer Whitehall, or more commonplace than Kingsway and Aldwych?
What department of a Government could have blocked a vista so
remorselessly as the Admiralty has done, or have betrayed a contempt
for beauty more disheartening than the County {12} Council has shown in
its latest horror at Westminster Bridge?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account