London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
The references to modern Jacobites in the Parliament at Westminster
began, however, now to be fewer and far between. There was not, on
the other hand, much additional respect expressed for ‘the happy
establishment.’ On an occasion in 1752, when 22,000_l._ were about to
be voted as a subsidy to the Elector of Saxony, some of ‘_the electoral
family_’ seem to have been present in the House. Beckford, as outspoken
as Shippen of old, saw his opportunity and remarked: ‘I am here as an
English gentleman; as such, I have the right to talk freely of the
greatest subject of the King, and much more of the greatest subject
of any foreign state. If there be any persons in the House, belonging
to any Princes of Germany, they ought not to be here; and, if they
are, they must take it for their pains;――for, their presence, I hope,
will not keep any member in such an awe as to prevent him from freely
speaking.’ The subsidy, however, was granted.
The principles of the men who surrounded the young Prince of Wales
became of absorbing interest,――for pure, as well as party, reasons.
Bubb Dodington, in December, 1752, speaks in his Diary of an anonymous
manifesto, which was in fact a remonstrance to the king from the Whig
nobility and gentry, against the method according to which the heir
to the throne was being educated; and also against the arbitrary
principles of the men then in power; but especially that ‘there was
a permanency of power placed in three men whom they looked upon as
dangerous; and that these three men entirely trusted and were governed
by two others, one of whom had the absolute direction of the Prince,
and was of a Tory family, and bred in arbitrary principles; and the
other, who was bred a professed Jacobite, of a declared Jacobite
family, and whose brother, now at Rome, was a favourite of the
Pretender, and even his Secretary of State. In short, the corollary
was, that Murray, Solicitor-General, and Stone, governed the country.’
A copy of this anti-Jacobite declaration reached the king’s hands.
‘What was the effect,’ says the diarist, ‘I can’t tell; but I know they
were very much intrigued to find out whence it came, and who was the
author.’
[Sidenote: _LORD EGMONT ON JACOBITES._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account