London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
The result was that king and parliament at Westminster, in this year
1824, restored the following forfeited titles:――Erskine, Lord Erskine,
Earl of Mar; Gordon, Lord Lochinvar and Viscount Kenmure; Nairn,
Lord Nairn; and Drummond, Lord Maderty, Drummond of Cromlix, and
Viscount Strathallan. The Viscount Strathallan restored this year was
a descendant of the viscount who was slain at Culloden, but who was
styled in the Whig London papers as ‘Mr. Drummond.’
[Sidenote: _A TRANSPONTINE PLAY._]
A minor incident, yet a characteristic one, may here be mentioned.
The power which in 1808 had prohibited the counterfeit presentment
on the stage of Charles Edward, could not obstruct those of George
III. and all his family, in 1824, at the ‘Coburg.’ This house, being
in Surrey, was beyond the jurisdiction of the Lord Chamberlain’s
office. The drama, acted in defiance of him and of good taste, was
called ‘George the Third, the Father of his People.’ The defunct king
(acted by Bengough, who singularly resembled him), and the deceased
Queen Charlotte, with her inseparable snuff-box, next delighted the
Transpontines with their gracious presence; but tenfold more delight
and amusement were caused by the presence of all the living members
of the royal family. In noticing this singular piece, the ‘Morning
Chronicle’ gave a Jacobite (or perhaps a Jacobin) flavour to its
criticism. The title, it argued, was disrespectful to George IV. It
is always the king on the throne who is the Father of his People.
George III., therefore, should have been styled the Grandfather of his
People! Again, in the drama, the latter is called ‘the best of kings,’
a designation which is the right of the king in possession; therefore,
said the ‘Chronicle,’ George III. was ‘the second best,’ or the author
might have called him ‘the best but one.’
[Sidenote: _THE BODY OF JAMES THE SECOND._]
It is a singular coincidence that the same year in which four Jacobite
peerages were relieved from attainder, the remains of James II. were
discovered at St. Germain. The body was for many years ‘deposited’ in
the chapel of the English Benedictines, Paris――body, _minus_ heart,
brains, and bowels, entombed in various places, to which places
English Jacobites used to resort as to holy shrines. The leaders of
civilisation, at the outbreak of the Revolution, smashed the urns
containing brains, &c., and scattered the contents. The body at the
Benedictines was treated with similar indignity; but, in a mutilated
form, it was privately interred at St. Germain. No mark was set on the
place, and it was forgotten, but was discovered this year in the course
of rebuilding a part of the church. Information of this discovery was
sent to London by our ambassador, to whom orders were sent from Downing
Street to see the remains re-interred with every religious ceremony
that could manifest respect.
[Sidenote: _CEREMONY AT ST. GERMAIN._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account