London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
The latest restoration was by legal process. Among the minor
unfortunates whose Jacobitism was punished by forfeiture, was a Lord
Balfour of Burleigh. In 1869, Mr. Bruce, of Kennett, Clackmannan,
gained his suit to Parliament, and recovered that resonant title; and
it is said that the modern Balfour of Burleigh has in his veins the
blood of Bruce;――which, after all, is not so honest or so legitimately
royal as that of Baliol.
[Sidenote: _TITLES UNDER ATTAINDER._]
With regard to Jacobite peerages, ‘Experience has shown that in the
absence of a Resolution and Judgment of the House of Lords, it is
a dangerous thing to say, without qualification, who represents a
Peerage. The Duchess of Sutherland is Countess of Cromartie, as the
Earl of Errol is Baron Kilmarnock, not in the Peerage of Scotland, but
that of the United Kingdom, in virtue of a recent creation. Each of
the _Scottish_ Peerages held by the three Jacobite Noblemen is still
open to any Nobleman who can establish a right thereto, and obtain a
reversal of the Attainder.’ (‘Notes and Queries,’ Jan. 11, 1873, p.
45.) As to the heir to the title of Balmerino, we find that Captain
John Elphinstone, R.N. (Admiral Elphinstone of the Russian Navy,――the
hero of Tchesme), left a son, William, also a captain in the Czar’s
navy, whose son, Alexander Francis, Captain R.N., and a noble of
Livonia (born 1799), claimed to be heir to the title of Balmerino,
were the attainder removed. All his sons were in the British naval or
military service, in which they and other members of the baronial house
greatly distinguished themselves.
[Sidenote: _FITZ-PRETENDERS._]
While some of the above titles were being relieved from the obloquy
which had been brought upon them by the Jacobitism of former wearers,
and no one was dreaming, except in some out-of-the-way corner of the
Scottish highlands, that the Jacobites had still, and had never ceased
to have, a king of their own, a strange, wild, story was developing
itself, which had a remarkably ridiculous, not to say impudent, object
for its motive. To make it understandable, the reader is asked to
go a few years back, in order to comprehend a mystery, in which the
‘Quarterly Review’ of June, 1847, in an article sometimes attributed to
the Rt. Hon. John Wilson Croker, but more correctly to Mr. Lockhart,
smashed all that was mysterious.
In the year 1800 (October 2nd), Admiral John Carter Allen (or Allan),
Admiral of the White, died at his house in Devonshire Place, London.
Such is the record in the ‘Gentleman’s Magazine.’ In the succeeding
number, a correspondent describes him as an old Westminster scholar, a
brave sailor, a Whig well looked upon by the Rockingham party, and of
such good blood as to induce Lord Hillsborough to believe that he was
the legal male heir to the earldom of Errol.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account