London in the Jacobite times, Volume IIDoran, Dr. (John)
History
London in the Jacobite times, Volume II
Doran, Dr. (John)
London (England) -- History -- 18th century
In the king’s speech, on opening the Session in January, 1729, there
was no reference to the Pretender. The king, however, attributed
certain delays at the Courts of Vienna and Madrid to ‘hopes given from
hence of creating discontents and division’ among his subjects; but if
this hope encouraged these foreign Courts, ‘I am persuaded,’ said the
king, ‘that your known affection for me, and a just regard for your own
honour, and the interest and security of the nation, will determine
you effectually to discourage the unnatural and injurious practices
of some few who suggest the means of distressing their country, and
afterwards clamour at the inconveniences which they themselves have
occasioned.’ In the usual reply, the Lords lamented that the lenity
of the constitution was daily abused, and that the basest and meanest
of mankind ‘escape the infamous punishment due by the laws of the
land to such crimes.’ The Commons, after some debate, employed terms
equally strong. ◆[Sidenote: _THE PRINCE OF WALES AT CHURCH._]◆ The
Heir Apparent used the opportunity to illustrate his fidelity to the
Protestant succession. Prince Frederick, to convince all good people of
his Protestant orthodoxy, went a round of the London churches. He was
accompanied by a group of young lords and gentlemen of good character,
and, at this time, his reputation did not suffer by his being judged
according to the company he kept. On the occasion of his dissipated
church-going, the prince and his noble followers took the Sacrament in
public: the doors of the church, whichever it might be, were set wide
open, and the church itself was packed by a mob of street Whigs and
Tories, who made their own comments on the spectacle, which was not
so edifying and impressive as it was intended to be. Fog’s Jacobite
paper hinted that a family not a hundred miles from St. James’s was
split up with petty domestic quarrelling. The family, indeed, dined
together twice a week in public; but people were reminded that outward
appearances were exceedingly deceptive,――and sacramental partakings (it
was said) proved nothing.
[Sidenote: _THE MORALS AND MANNERS OF THE TIME._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account