In dress and weapons armour had not yet disappeared, but it was much
less cumbrous. The corselet, with a morion, or open head-piece, and
thigh guards were still in general use; but plates of armour were
frequently fastened to any ordinary tunic for the defence of the
shoulders, arms, and chest. The pike-men, with their twenty-foot
pikes, wore corselets, and were much disinclined to march more than
five or six miles a day, owing to the weight of their dresses and
weapons. The bill-men were in lighter armour, and their weapons were
shorter than the pike, but very effective against cavalry. The bill
was a hook-shaped blade fastened to a wooden staff, with a projecting
prong at the end and back. Pike-men and bill-men were employed in
protecting archers from cavalry and in covering such field-guns as
were in use. Civic guards and watchmen were armed with bills. The
archers wore a buff-padded jacket, with sometimes an under-shirt of
light chain-armour. A jerkin, of leather or cloth, was indiscriminately
worn by all ranks. The firearms were of two kinds, leaving out of view
artillery. The first could be fired with a rest, and the second were
practically very light artillery. The harquebus and the small petronel
belonged to the first class, and the culverin, the long petronel, and
the muschite (from the French mosquet, a hawk) to the second. Two
men were required to handle the weapons of the second class. They
had long barrels. They were fired with a match, the barrels resting
on an iron fork sticking in the ground. The harquebus was originally
a musket-stock with a bow fixed to it; but the term was now used to
mean the long-barrelled hand-gun with a touch hole and priming pan and
trigger on the right side, which was rapidly driving out other weapons
and rendering armour useless.
[Illustration: A KNIGHT IN ARMOUR
From Meyrick’s _Inquiry into Antient Armour_.]
[Illustration: PIKEMAN
From Grose’s _Military Antiquities_.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account