Gardens -- England -- London; London (England) -- Description and travel; Parks -- England -- London
The Elm Avenue was part of Compton’s design, and many very fine trees
known to be his remain to this day. During the long duration of his
episcopate--1675 to 1714--he had time to see his plants grow and
flourish. His gardening achievements were much appreciated in his own
day. John Evelyn, a great authority on horticultural matters, was
often at Fulham. He notes in his Diary on Oct. 11, 1681: “To Fulham
to visit the Bishop of London, in whose garden I first saw the _Sedum
arborescens_ in flower, which was exceedingly beautiful.” Richard
Bradley, a well-known gardener, in his book published in 1717, quotes
many of the plants at Fulham as examples in his pages. With regard
to the passion flower, his notice is interesting, as it gives the
name of Bishop Compton’s gardener. “That [the passion flower] may
bear fruit,” he writes, “we must Plant it in very moist and cool
places, where it may be continually fed with Water; this I had from
the Curious Mr. Adam Holt, Gardener to the late Bishop of London,
who shew’d me a letter from the West Indies, from whence I learnt it
was an Inhabitant of Swampy Places.” Bradley had seen the pistachio
fruiting against a wall at Fulham, and he thought he had also noticed
an olive flourishing there. From time to time there have been special
notices of the trees round the Bishop’s palace. Sir William Watson
wrote a paper on them for the Royal Society, in which he gives a list
of thirty-seven special trees, many of them the finest of their kind in
England. “For exemplification of this I would,” he says, “recommend to
the curious observer the black Virginian walnut tree, the cluster pine,
the honey locust, the pseudo-acacia, the ash maple, &c., now remaining
at Fulham.” Many of the later bishops have paid great attention to
the grounds. Bishop Porteous (1787–1809) who planted cedars; Howley
(1813–1828), and especially Blomfield (1828–1856), all took delight
in the Garden. Bishop Blomfield planted a deciduous cypress and the
ailanthus, which now measures 10 feet 4 inches at 4 feet from the
ground, curiously exactly the same girth as the one at Broom House
close by. In 1865, Bishop Tait had the old trees measured, and there
are later measurements of some of the finest. The cork tree was 13
feet 9 inches, and although sadly shattered, part of this magnificent
old tree, with its thick cork bark, still holds its own. The great
black walnut or hickory has not been so fortunate, and died about ten
years ago, and only a venerable stump is left; but a good specimen
still stands in the meadow. The great tree in 1865 measured 15 feet 5
inches; in 1894, 17 feet 3 inches. The tulip tree died about the same
time as the hickory. The honey locust (_Gleditschia triacanthos_), one
of Bishop Compton’s trees, only died last year, the large white elm in
1904, and, sad to say, the flowering ash (_Fraxinus ornus_) was blown
down in March 1907. The Wych elm and a beautiful walnut still flourish,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account