Lord Byron as a satirist in verseFuess, Claude Moore
History
Lord Byron as a satirist in verse
Fuess, Claude Moore
Byron, George Gordon Byron, Baron, 1788-1824 -- Criticism and interpretation; Verse satire, English -- History and criticism
The significant feature of _The Devil’s Drive_ is the mocking spirit
which animates the poem. Although the humor is sometimes clumsy and
cheap, and the style formless and crude, the underlying tone is no
longer ferocious, and the satire is no longer mere invective. The work
is practically the only satire of Byron’s before _Beppo_ in which are
mingled the cool scorn, the bizarre wit, and the grotesque realism
which were to be blended in _Don Juan_. The poem, too, is proof that
by 1814, at least, Byron was firmly fixed in most of his political
opinions. He had shown his dislike for Castlereagh and the Regent; he
had expressed himself as opposed to all war and bloodshed, except in a
righteous cause; and he had become an advanced liberal thinker, ready
to oppose all unprogressive measures.
After the publication of the _Corsair_ in January, 1814, Byron
announced his intention of quitting poetry.[161] His resolution,
however, was short-lived, for on April 10th he wrote Murray that he
had just finished an “ode on the fall of Napoleon.”[162] Byron had,
from the first, been interested in the career of Napoleon, with whom
he felt, apparently, an instinctive sympathy. The poet’s expressed
judgments of the Emperor seem, however, to indicate several changes in
sentiment. In _Childe Harold_ he had called him “Gaul’s Vulture,” and
had spoken of “one bloated chief’s unwholesome reign”; in his Journal
for November 17, 1813, he said: “He (Napoleon) has been a _Héros de
Roman_ of mine--on the Continent--I don’t want him here.”[163] The
_Ode to Napoleon Buonaparte_, composed in a single day after the news
of the abdication of Fontainebleau, is a severe attack on the fallen
Emperor, in which Byron, reproaching him for not having committed
suicide, terms him “ill-minded man,” “Dark Spirit,” and “throneless
homicide,” ending with an uncomplimentary contrast between him and
Washington. Nevertheless, when the report of Waterloo reached him,
Byron cried: “I am damned sorry for it.” In three poems written shortly
after--_Napoleon’s Farewell_, _Lines from the French_, and _An Ode from
the French_--he shows a kind of admiration for the Corsican. Finally
came the splendid stanzas on Napoleon in _Childe Harold_, III,[164]
ending with the personal reference, implying that Byron’s own faults
and virtues were those of the French emperor and exile.
The one long classical satire during this period is _The Waltz_, which
has to do primarily with society. On October 18, 1812, Byron wrote
Murray: “I have a poem on Waltzing for you, of which I make you a
present; but it must be anonymous. It is in the old style of _English
Bards, and Scotch Reviewers_.”[165] The satire was printed in the
spring of 1813, but was so coldly received that Byron, on April 21,
1813, begged Murray to deny the report that he was the author of “a
certain malicious publication on Waltzing.”[166] The whole affair
leaves Byron under the suspicion of duplicity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account